home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments: 1268031159

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7059#issuecomment-1268031159 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7059 1268031159 IC_kwDOAMm_X85LlJ63 691772 2022-10-05T07:02:23Z 2022-10-05T07:02:48Z CONTRIBUTOR

I agree with just passing all args explicitly. Does it work otherwise with "processes"?

What do you mean by that?

  1. Why are you chunking iniside the mapped function?

Uhm yes, you are right, this should be removed, not sure how this happened. Removing .chunk({"time": None}) in the lambda function does not change the behavior of the example regarding this issue.

  1. If you conda install flox, the resample operation should be quite efficient, without the need to use map_blocks

Oh wow, thanks! Haven't seen flox before.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  1379372915
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 2.037ms · About: xarray-datasette