issue_comments: 1251836989
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7045#issuecomment-1251836989 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7045 | 1251836989 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KnYQ9 | 12912489 | 2022-09-20T04:48:07Z | 2022-09-20T06:13:32Z | NONE | This suggestion looks roughly like what we are discussing in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/discussions/7041#discussioncomment-3662179, i.e., using a custom index that avoids this? So maybe the question here is whether such an Aside from that, with my outside perspective (having used Xarray extremely little, looking at the docs and code occasionally, but developing a similar library that does not have indexes): Indexes (including alignment behavior) feel like a massive complication of Xarray, both conceptually (which includes documentation and teaching efforts) as well as code. If all you require is the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1376109308 |