issue_comments: 125068381
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/495#issuecomment-125068381 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/495 | 125068381 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEyNTA2ODM4MQ== | 1217238 | 2015-07-27T02:55:50Z | 2015-07-27T02:55:50Z | MEMBER | This looks very nice -- thanks for putting together the PR!
I wouldn't bother with this. It's not so elegant, and
I wouldn't allow full control here, but maybe a keyword argument for choosing whether to take the "lower", "upper" or "mean" labels would be appropriate.
I agree. It would be better to skip those variables entirely, like the current behavior for aggregation functions like mean. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
97237275 |