issue_comments: 1246487152
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6975#issuecomment-1246487152 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6975 | 1246487152 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KS-Jw | 4160723 | 2022-09-14T09:25:24Z | 2022-09-14T09:25:24Z | MEMBER | Thanks @dcherian and @TomNicholas for your feeback! @dcherian I will reply to your inline comments when I'll integrate your suggestions in this PR. @TomNicholas I answer to your comments below.
That's exactly why your feedback is valuable!
I agree this could be detailed more in the Index API docstrings in a consistent way. For some methods like
We should clarify that the aim of Some Index API like
I've tried to explain it in the "Index base class" section and the sections below, but maybe it should be emphasized more?
I guess you mean it is shown through
I agree, although Overall, I think that the whole "Xarray Internals" section could be streamlined beyond a bunch of loosely-coupled document pages.
I agree that we need more examples, but I also think that too much examples may tend to make things more confused. One thing that I like very much in https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/ is how a small example is picked for each tutorial and then is shown by highlighting the relevant code for every subsection. Is it possible to do that with Sphinx / RST? It's hard to show all features through one succinct example, though. Like @dcherian says in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6975#discussion_r967495773, we could invite people to look into the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1358841264 |