issue_comments: 1208311997
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4972#issuecomment-1208311997 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4972 | 1208311997 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85IBWC9 | 35968931 | 2022-08-08T16:00:01Z | 2022-08-08T16:00:01Z | MEMBER | I'm watching the progress of this PR with bated breath! I literally want to be able to test 3 different array libraries right now: pint, cubed, and awkward. :exploding_head: Thinking about the complexity of testing like this in general I have a bunch of follow-up questions for future PRs though, e.g: 1) Shouldn't we start with some very simple tests that first check if the correct properties are defined on the wrapped array class, i.e. Should I therefore make a separate issue to specifically track how we test (and expose test frameworks for) duck array wrapping? (So we can discuss these questions there?) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
818059250 |