home / github / issue_comments

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments: 1196874535

This data as json

html_url issue_url id node_id user created_at updated_at author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6837#issuecomment-1196874535 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6837 1196874535 IC_kwDOAMm_X85HVtsn 4806877 2022-07-27T15:00:43Z 2022-07-27T15:00:43Z CONTRIBUTOR

Thanks for engaging with this! I think removing load probably makes the most sense. Making load an alias for compute would just continue the confusion since there wouldn't be a clear right way to do things.

I somehow assumed compute would only work with dask while load would also load our lazy array implementation into memory. Not sure how I got that impression, but maybe that's another argument to remove / align load?

I'm not quite sure I follow. Are there lazy array implementations other than dask in xarray?

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  1319621859
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 154.041ms · About: xarray-datasette