issue_comments: 116165986
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/444#issuecomment-116165986 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/444 | 116165986 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDExNjE2NTk4Ng== | 1217238 | 2015-06-27T23:40:29Z | 2015-06-27T23:40:29Z | MEMBER | Of course, concurrent access to HDF5 files works fine on my laptop, using Anaconda's build of HDF5 (version 1.8.14). I have no idea what special flags they invoked when building it :). That said, I have been unable to produce any benchmarks that show improved performance when simply doing multithreaded reads without doing any computation (e.g., Given these considerations, it seems like we should use a lock when reading data into xray with dask. @mrocklin we could just use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
91184107 |