issue_comments: 1114196391
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6548#issuecomment-1114196391 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6548 | 1114196391 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CaUmn | 43316012 | 2022-05-01T10:27:52Z | 2022-05-01T10:27:52Z | COLLABORATOR | Some performance comparison: With 5th order polynomial and 10 x-values: old: 1.05 ms ± 15.8 µs per loop new: 1.41 ms ± 11.6 µs per loop With 5th order polynomial and 10000 x-values: old: 1.46 ms ± 10.5 µs per loop new: 1.41 ms ± 14.5 µs per loop With 5th order polynomial and 1mio x-values: old: 65.1 ms ± 332 µs per loop new: 6.99 ms ± 168 µs per loop As expected for small arrays the new method creates some overhead, but for larger arrays the speedup is quite nice. Also, it uses in-place operations with much less memory usage. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
1221848774 |