issue_comments: 1094086518
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6309#issuecomment-1094086518 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6309 | 1094086518 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85BNm92 | 90008 | 2022-04-09T17:06:13Z | 2022-04-09T17:06:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @max-sixty unfortunately, I think the way hdf5 is designed, it doesn't try to be too smart about what would be the best fine tuning for your particular system. In some ways, this is the correct approach. The current constructor pathway: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/main/xarray/backends/h5netcdf_.py#L164 Doesn't provide a user with a catchall-kwargs. I think this would be an acceptable solution. I should say that the the performance of the direct driver is terrible without aligned data: https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf-c/pull/2206#issuecomment-1054855769 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1152047670 |