issue_comments: 107141480
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/411#issuecomment-107141480 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/411 | 107141480 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDEwNzE0MTQ4MA== | 1217238 | 2015-05-31T07:46:38Z | 2015-05-31T07:46:38Z | MEMBER | This is expected -- we do orthogonal indexing (treating each coordinate independently), not NumPy style fancy indexing. If you read on in the indexing docs, you'll find this under "Indexing details": http://xray.readthedocs.org/en/latest/indexing.html#indexing-details Perhaps we should note this more prominently! The style of indexing you're describing here is definitely useful, though (e.g., for selecting the locations of stations from a grid) -- it's something that I would really like to support. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
83000406 |