issue_comments: 1059426353
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6329#issuecomment-1059426353 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6329 | 1059426353 | IC_kwDOAMm_X84_JZAx | 6574622 | 2022-03-04T18:48:13Z | 2022-03-04T18:48:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | If that's necessary to reproduce the problem, then yes. If it's possible to show the same thing with less "noise", then it's better to not use the tutorial dataset and to not use something like a cloud backend. But we can also try to iterate on this again, to progressively get down to a smaller example. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
1159923690 |