{"database": "github", "table": "issue_comments", "is_view": false, "human_description_en": "where author_association = \"COLLABORATOR\" sorted by updated_at descending", "rows": [["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7862#issuecomment-1578777785", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7862", 1578777785, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85eGjy5", 43316012, "2023-06-06T13:31:34Z", "2023-06-06T13:31:34Z", "COLLABORATOR", "If you want you can leave a comment \nBut the mypy CI should fail on unused ignores, so we will notice :)", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1720045908], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7891#issuecomment-1577364529", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7891", 1577364529, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85eBKwx", 43316012, "2023-06-05T19:35:33Z", "2023-06-05T19:35:33Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> You could use `DataArray.round` to round to significant decimals.\n\nBetter to use a tolerance in the assterion testing.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1740268634], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7862#issuecomment-1574278204", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7862", 1574278204, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85d1ZQ8", 43316012, "2023-06-02T20:27:46Z", "2023-06-02T20:28:29Z", "COLLABORATOR", "This seems to be a numpy issue, mypy thinks that you cannot call np.dtype like you do.\n\nMight be worth an issue over at numpy with the example from the test.\n\nFor now we can simply ignore this error.", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1720045908], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7880#issuecomment-1572359754", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7880", 1572359754, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85duE5K", 43316012, "2023-06-01T16:23:45Z", "2023-06-01T16:23:45Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Maybe you can add a test that creates a cachingFilemanager object, then deletes it, then run `gc.collect()` and check somehow if it works? But no idea how pytest interferes with this or how you can ensure that there are no references to the module anymore?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1730664352], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7670#issuecomment-1572259965", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7670", 1572259965, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85dtsh9", 43316012, "2023-06-01T15:22:33Z", "2023-06-01T15:22:33Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> The cfgrib notebook in the documentation is broken. I guess it's related to this PR.\n> See: https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ERA5-GRIB-example.html\n\n\nSame problem with https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7841", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1639732867], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7880#issuecomment-1567450094", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7880", 1567450094, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85dbWPu", 43316012, "2023-05-29T19:28:21Z", "2023-05-29T19:28:21Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> I think this is intended (though certainly not very easy to get right): see the second part of the [warning in the `__del__` documentation](https://docs.python.org/3/reference/datamodel.html#object.__del__).\n\nYou are right, that warning is exactly what is causing the issues.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1730664352], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7880#issuecomment-1567439206", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7880", 1567439206, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85dbTlm", 43316012, "2023-05-29T19:09:41Z", "2023-05-29T19:09:41Z", "COLLABORATOR", "That's quite a weird bug. I would have thought that the global (or module level here) variable/function aquire should have at least one reference until after the deletion of the object.\nIs that a bug in pythons garbage collection?\n\nOr does the garbage collection already start when calling `del` and does not wait for the completion of the `__del__` method?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1730664352], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5644#issuecomment-1561096393", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5644", 1561096393, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85dDHDJ", 43316012, "2023-05-24T12:56:48Z", "2023-05-24T12:56:48Z", "COLLABORATOR", "You can always reach out to the creator of the original PR and comment in the PR.\n\nBut it looks like this particular PR was reaching a dead end and should be completely rewritten.\nBut anyway the reviewers left helpful remarks on how to proceed. ", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 955043280], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7851#issuecomment-1554621577", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7851", 1554621577, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85cqaSJ", 43316012, "2023-05-19T14:01:42Z", "2023-05-19T14:01:42Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I think this goes a bit against the rest of xarray which discourages in place operations.\n\nBut on the other hand, both deleting a variable and extracting a DataArray exist on their own, so why not combine it.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1717209758], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7840#issuecomment-1547169473", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7840", 1547169473, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85cN-7B", 43316012, "2023-05-15T04:15:53Z", "2023-05-15T04:15:53Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Well that's the point, \"x\" is a dimension as well as a coordinate. And since dimensions are names you cannot assign anything to them.\nIf you want you can change coordinate by dimension coordinate.", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1707774178], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7840#issuecomment-1546939363", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7840", 1546939363, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85cNGvj", 43316012, "2023-05-14T16:29:13Z", "2023-05-14T16:29:13Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I agree that there is a lot of terminology that is somewhat similar and/or overlapping.\n\nIn math you have the basis of a vector space which when plotting in a coordinate system you sometimes call coordinates or axes.\nAlso you often use the phrase \"the x-coordinate of point p is ...\", So I understand why naming an axis \"coordinate\" might sound reasonable.\n\nHowever in xarray (or numerics in general) you often deal with data that is not aligned to any axis in a given coordinate system.\nConsider the following example: you have a time series of points that might be scattered randomly in your coordinate system. Now you can assign to each point a x and y coordinate.\nIn xarray you would call the dimension of the data e.g. \"time\". You will need two additional time series of data points for the x and y coordinates.\n\nIn xarray this would be something like that:\n```python\nda = xr.DataArray(\n[5, 6, 7],\ndims=\"time\",\ncoords={\n    \"x\": (\"time\", [1, 2, 3]),\n    \"y\": (\"time\", [9, 8, 7]),\n    \"time\": [0, 1, 2]\n}\n```\nYou can see that in this example we cannot easily define a x-y coordinate system since the data points are not on a grid. But still we can assign each data point a x and y coordinate.\n\nNow finding a naming convention that fits both, random data points and lattices that are aligned with the coordinate system is not trivial.\n\nThat's why we choose to go with the following:\n- **dimension**: name of an axis of a nd-array, this might be a \"real\" axis that has any real world equivalent or something as trivial as \"order in which the data has been aquisited\". In the example this was \"time\".\n- **coordinate**: auxiliary data that can be used to identify the data values. In the example this was \"x\" and \"y\". (Basically it is a short name for \"coordinate variable\")\n- **dimension coordinate**: a coordinate that assigns values to the dimension directly if possible. This is the case when the name of a coordinate is the same as a dimension. In the example this was \"time\" with the timestamps 0, 1 and 2 (probably this should be real timestamps).\n\nFeel free to propose some changes to the documentation such that newcomers will find it easier to understand the terminology.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1707774178], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7840#issuecomment-1546029852", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7840", 1546029852, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85cJosc", 43316012, "2023-05-12T16:57:53Z", "2023-05-12T16:57:53Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Yes exactly. A dimension is only a name for an axis.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1707774178], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7840#issuecomment-1545930547", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7840", 1545930547, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85cJQcz", 43316012, "2023-05-12T15:32:29Z", "2023-05-12T15:32:29Z", "COLLABORATOR", "This is a bit misleading. I think the term coordinate is correct, but you can be more precise and use dimension-coordinate, see:\nhttps://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/user-guide/data-structures.html#coordinates\n\nMaybe we should start calling them index as well? But I think the concept of dimension-coordinates (when the coordinate has the same name as the dimension) is still relevant.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1707774178], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7676#issuecomment-1541835110", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7676", 1541835110, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85b5olm", 43316012, "2023-05-10T09:56:52Z", "2023-05-10T09:56:52Z", "COLLABORATOR", "@Mehak-4545 are you still working on this? You need to change the style of your docstrings and examples. See other docstrings formatting for inspiration.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1640453837], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7831#issuecomment-1540811425", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7831", 1540811425, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85b1uqh", 43316012, "2023-05-09T19:57:48Z", "2023-05-09T19:57:48Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I don't know how we would implement that, it's probably not a good idea to special case all external backends within xarray.\n\nEither the package is installed and then it works or it is not installed and then we don't know which backend/package is missing.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1702025553], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7816#issuecomment-1535358946", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7816", 1535358946, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85bg7fi", 43316012, "2023-05-04T20:18:51Z", "2023-05-04T20:24:26Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I am not sure what exactly is not working.\nThe BACKEND_ENTRYPOINTS is not a public API and is only used for xarrays internal backends.\nIn the documentation that you have linked it is explained on how to register your project, which is purely in the setup.cfg/pyproject.toml, no need to manipulate xarray internal objects.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1695809136], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7758#issuecomment-1509899180", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7758", 1509899180, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z_zus", 43316012, "2023-04-15T17:19:38Z", "2023-04-15T17:19:38Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Maybe I was not clear enough, sry for that.\nWith remote file system I meant that you mount e.g. an NFS drive.\n\nIt seems that you are using a https protocol to transfer the data.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1668898601], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7754#issuecomment-1509585164", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7754", 1509585164, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z-nEM", 43316012, "2023-04-15T06:33:50Z", "2023-04-15T06:33:50Z", "COLLABORATOR", "What happens when you specify the netcdf4 engine directly? (Assuming it is a nc4 and not nc3 file).", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1667556281], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7758#issuecomment-1509537842", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7758", 1509537842, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z-bgy", 43316012, "2023-04-15T05:35:50Z", "2023-04-15T05:35:50Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Which backend are you using?\nIs it a \"real\" server or simply a remote filesystem?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1668898601], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7754#issuecomment-1508940623", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7754", 1508940623, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z8JtP", 43316012, "2023-04-14T16:43:59Z", "2023-04-14T16:43:59Z", "COLLABORATOR", "The error message tells that the backends are installed and can be found by xarray.\n\nWhat exactly did you try to open? A local file? If yes, can you provide the name of this file?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1667556281], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7748#issuecomment-1506550069", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7748", 1506550069, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZzCE1", 43316012, "2023-04-13T08:20:24Z", "2023-04-13T08:20:24Z", "COLLABORATOR", "See also somewhat related discussion here https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6749", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1664193419], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7748#issuecomment-1506544631", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7748", 1506544631, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZzAv3", 43316012, "2023-04-13T08:16:11Z", "2023-04-13T08:16:11Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Not sure what the correct way would be.\n\nIf you consider that `d f(x) / d y = 0`, maybe all zeros could be considered correct as well.\nThe same result can be obtained if one considers that the array might be broadcast to the y-dim.\n\nAlso we have to check that happens in Datasets if one of the variables does not contain this dimension, do we raise an error as well?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1664193419], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7746#issuecomment-1502954308", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7746", 1502954308, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZlUNE", 43316012, "2023-04-11T09:06:09Z", "2023-04-11T09:06:09Z", "COLLABORATOR", "By the way: even for such a small contribution you can add an entry into the whats-new changelog. If you wish to do so, you can open another PR and I will quickly merge it (I was too fast merging this one...).", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1661789758], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7746#issuecomment-1502785268", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7746", 1502785268, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Zkq70", 43316012, "2023-04-11T07:04:01Z", "2023-04-11T07:04:01Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Thanks for this nice little PR!", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1661789758], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7742#issuecomment-1502746054", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7742", 1502746054, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZkhXG", 43316012, "2023-04-11T06:20:08Z", "2023-04-11T06:20:08Z", "COLLABORATOR", "@ChristmasZCY does this answer your question? If yes, feel free to close this issue .", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1659786592], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7724#issuecomment-1501150705", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7724", 1501150705, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Zeb3x", 43316012, "2023-04-09T15:09:37Z", "2023-04-09T15:09:37Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Locally it always works, it segfaults in CI, which makes it impossible to debug.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1655782486], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/620#issuecomment-1500937954", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/620", 1500937954, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Zdn7i", 43316012, "2023-04-08T17:20:35Z", "2023-04-08T17:20:50Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Reviving this ancient issue here.\nWe could add a deprecation cycle and issue a warning for dimensions with size 1.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 110820316], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7735#issuecomment-1500935213", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7735", 1500935213, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZdnQt", 43316012, "2023-04-08T17:05:53Z", "2023-04-08T17:05:53Z", "COLLABORATOR", "From 2.07\u00b10.04ms to 369\u00b110\u03bcs seems good :)", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1658287592], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7724#issuecomment-1500907146", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7724", 1500907146, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZdgaK", 43316012, "2023-04-08T14:53:42Z", "2023-04-08T14:53:42Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> @Illviljan, @headtr1ck, I just noticed that the CI version of `mypy` is pinned to `<0.990`, but the `pre-commit` hook is at `1.1.1`. Is that intentional / known? Running the hook also exposes quite a few typing errors.\r\n\r\nI think this is because of https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7270\r\n\r\nThe pre-commit hook of mypy should be disabled anyway because it takes too long to run (should be actually much faster since mypy >=1).\r\n\r\nI think we could check if the newest mypy still segfaults or not...\r\n", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1655782486], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7732#issuecomment-1500324581", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7732", 1500324581, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZbSLl", 43316012, "2023-04-07T14:09:07Z", "2023-04-07T14:11:35Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Actually on top of examples maybe some simple text depictions could be useful?\nSomething like this for aligning:\nValues: [ A A A ] + [ B B ] -> [ A B A B A ]\nIndex:.  [ 1 3 5 ] + [ 2 4 ] -> [ 1 2 3 4 5 ]\n\nBut just throwing ideas around\n\nEdit: that's actually not what aligning does, haha. But you get the idea.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1657534038], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3921#issuecomment-1498503222", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3921", 1498503222, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZUVg2", 43316012, "2023-04-06T05:14:46Z", "2023-04-06T05:14:46Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I think the last remaining item has been fixed by https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7586, but not completely sure.\n\nThen we could close this issue :)", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 590630281], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7635#issuecomment-1495843182", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7635", 1495843182, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZKMFu", 43316012, "2023-04-04T11:54:17Z", "2023-04-04T11:54:17Z", "COLLABORATOR", "@dsgreen2 if you apply the last review comments this is good to go.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1627298527], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7698#issuecomment-1495840833", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7698", 1495840833, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZKLhB", 43316012, "2023-04-04T11:52:08Z", "2023-04-04T11:52:08Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I think this logic is done one level above in the call stack. But yes, maybe a different name for the argument would be better.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1646350377], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7711#issuecomment-1494151318", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7711", 1494151318, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZDvCW", 43316012, "2023-04-03T11:29:01Z", "2023-04-03T11:29:01Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Not sure what you are proposing here.\nWe have extensive documentation on data indexing and selection here https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/user-guide/indexing.html\n\nIf this is not what you mean, please update your description and title to something more meaningful.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1651829181], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7706#issuecomment-1493396616", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7706", 1493396616, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZA2yI", 43316012, "2023-04-02T17:25:02Z", "2023-04-02T17:25:02Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Oh, you can add an entry in whats-new if you want!", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 1, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1650309361], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7703#issuecomment-1492167253", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7703", 1492167253, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y8KpV", 43316012, "2023-03-31T15:45:01Z", "2023-03-31T15:45:01Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Is working again :)", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1648748263], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7694#issuecomment-1491538813", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7694", 1491538813, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y5xN9", 43316012, "2023-03-31T08:41:37Z", "2023-03-31T08:41:37Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> @headtr1ck Read the docs build is failing. Is it due to issue #7703. Or the fault is on my side.\n\nYes, that is this issue.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1644759739], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7669#issuecomment-1491367287", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7669", 1491367287, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y5HV3", 43316012, "2023-03-31T06:23:18Z", "2023-03-31T06:23:38Z", "COLLABORATOR", "\n> The failing docs CI is caused by `pydata-sphinx-theme=0.13.2` being incompatible with `sphinx-book-theme=1.0.0`. I think we can pin `pydata-sphinx-theme!=0.13.2` until they fixed that (though maybe that should be done in a new PR).\n\nJust saw this comment. I have opened #7703 for this", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1639361476], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7623#issuecomment-1491365165", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7623", 1491365165, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y5G0t", 43316012, "2023-03-31T06:22:28Z", "2023-03-31T06:22:28Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> I am not sure if pinning works as pydata-sphinx-theme  had some private function which sphinx-book-theme was using but now it cannot.\n> Will probably have to wait for a new release of sphinx-book-theme.\n\nSee #7703\n", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1623776623], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7523#issuecomment-1491364430", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7523", 1491364430, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y5GpO", 43316012, "2023-03-31T06:22:09Z", "2023-03-31T06:22:09Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Thanks for the fixes.\nI have opened an issue about the readthedocs failing #7703, it's not an issue of this PR.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1581313830], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7701#issuecomment-1490906724", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7701", 1490906724, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y3W5k", 43316012, "2023-03-30T20:26:08Z", "2023-03-30T20:26:08Z", "COLLABORATOR", "How did you test this? I just tried it with 2023.03.0 and 2022.06.0 with all other packages the same and I get the same results (the one you say is new).", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1647883619], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7697#issuecomment-1489146483", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7697", 1489146483, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YwpJz", 43316012, "2023-03-29T19:02:39Z", "2023-03-29T19:02:39Z", "COLLABORATOR", "It seems that this problematic code is mostly used to determine the engine that is used to finally open it. Did you try specifying the correct engine directly?", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1646267547], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7698#issuecomment-1489144606", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7698", 1489144606, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Ywose", 43316012, "2023-03-29T19:01:21Z", "2023-03-29T19:01:21Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I think some backends rely on this magic number to determine the exact file format.\nNot sure if this change will cause problems if one doesn't get the full 8 bytes?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1646350377], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7553#issuecomment-1484860906", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7553", 1484860906, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YgS3q", 43316012, "2023-03-27T10:04:34Z", "2023-03-27T10:04:34Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Thanks for this PR!", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1597118095], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6891#issuecomment-1484199176", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6891", 1484199176, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YdxUI", 43316012, "2023-03-26T19:30:08Z", "2023-03-26T19:30:25Z", "COLLABORATOR", "As said above, you don't have to change code to make it work. The intended way of using is `da.curvefit(...., kwargs={\"method\": \"trf\"})`.\n\nYou can submit a PR which changes **kwargs to kwargs in the docstring (both, Dataset.curvefit and DataArray.curvefit) and probably add some more info there.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1331985070], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6515#issuecomment-1484196360", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6515", 1484196360, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YdwoI", 43316012, "2023-03-26T19:18:15Z", "2023-03-26T19:18:15Z", "COLLABORATOR", "@StanczakDominik are you still motivated to work on these tests?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1215946244], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6891#issuecomment-1484195905", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6891", 1484195905, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YdwhB", 43316012, "2023-03-26T19:16:38Z", "2023-03-26T19:16:38Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Actually, as @kmuehlbauer pointed out, we can address this for now by updating the docstring of the function.\nIt should get clear the the extra kwargs are passed as a dict and not as **kwargs.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1331985070], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7130#issuecomment-1484195481", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7130", 1484195481, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YdwaZ", 43316012, "2023-03-26T19:14:48Z", "2023-03-26T19:15:00Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> I am trying out open source for the first time through Outreachy. Could you please guide me a little so that I could proceed with this issue.\n\nWelcome to xarray!\nI think this issue requires some discussion before we can actually address code changes.\nIt would be better to start with a different issue first.", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1397104515], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6891#issuecomment-1484188179", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6891", 1484188179, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YduoT", 43316012, "2023-03-26T19:02:12Z", "2023-03-26T19:02:12Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I think we should continue the discussion in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7130\nsince it is not clear which function signature (kwargs vs **kwargs) is preferred.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1331985070], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7638#issuecomment-1484183805", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7638", 1484183805, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Ydtj9", 43316012, "2023-03-26T18:43:32Z", "2023-03-26T18:43:32Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Thanks for this contribution!", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1627983028], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7638#issuecomment-1484174808", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7638", 1484174808, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YdrXY", 43316012, "2023-03-26T18:07:05Z", "2023-03-26T18:07:05Z", "COLLABORATOR", "In https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/main/doc/whats-new.rst\n\nAdd a line under the documentation section explaining what you have added. Use the rest of the file as a guideline on how to format.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1627983028], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7523#issuecomment-1484155605", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7523", 1484155605, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YdmrV", 43316012, "2023-03-26T16:50:35Z", "2023-03-26T16:50:35Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Last call for reviews :)", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1581313830], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7638#issuecomment-1484151016", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7638", 1484151016, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Ydljo", 43316012, "2023-03-26T16:31:49Z", "2023-03-26T16:31:49Z", "COLLABORATOR", "@harshitha1201 feel free to add an entry in doc/whats-new.rst.\r\nThen we can merge this. Thanks!", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1627983028], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7674#issuecomment-1483833424", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7674", 1483833424, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YcYBQ", 43316012, "2023-03-25T14:05:58Z", "2023-03-25T14:05:58Z", "COLLABORATOR", "About the logo, this might be relevant: https://github.com/xarray-contrib/xarray.dev/issues/66", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1640260666], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6956#issuecomment-1480142197", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6956", 1480142197, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YOS11", 43316012, "2023-03-22T19:31:00Z", "2023-03-22T19:31:00Z", "COLLABORATOR", "The error of mypy is real, but unfortunately this is a design error on our side, which is out of scope for this PR.\r\nsee the mypy message:\r\n> xarray/backends/netCDF4_.py:563: error: Signature of \"open_dataset\" incompatible with supertype \"BackendEntrypoint\"  [override]\r\n\r\nso simply add a `# type: ignore[override]` at the end of this line.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1352315409], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7657#issuecomment-1480136698", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7657", 1480136698, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YORf6", 43316012, "2023-03-22T19:26:18Z", "2023-03-22T19:26:18Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> Does anyone know why those take so long only on macos (and, partially, windows)? Does that have to do with the runner hardware?\r\n\r\nSome of there files are 10 numbers, so the netcdf should be ~50kb or so (mostly the header overhead).\r\nOn no hardware this should take >1min to read and write?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1635470616], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1477639520", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019", 1477639520, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85YEv1g", 43316012, "2023-03-21T11:03:05Z", "2023-03-21T11:03:05Z", "COLLABORATOR", "\n> I just released Cubed 0.6.0 which doesn't have a dependency on Dask, so this should be possible now.\n\nDoes this mean my comment https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#discussion_r970713341 is valid again?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1368740629], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7646#issuecomment-1475399293", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7646", 1475399293, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85X8M59", 43316012, "2023-03-19T21:13:48Z", "2023-03-19T21:13:48Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Can you see if you can run `import numba` in your environment?\n\nIf this also raises an error, your numba installation is probably broken.\n\nIf this works, then try `import sparse`.\n\nAnyway, please add the output of `xr.show_versions()` to your issue.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1630998880], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7521#issuecomment-1474861240", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7521", 1474861240, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85X6Ji4", 43316012, "2023-03-18T14:08:20Z", "2023-03-18T14:08:20Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I guess we should revert this change and use our own definition as proposed by the numpy defs.\nIf I find time I'll make a new PR such that we can be independent off numpys version in this regard.", "{\"total_count\": 2, \"+1\": 2, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1580266844], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5985#issuecomment-1473820156", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5985", 1473820156, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85X2LX8", 43316012, "2023-03-17T13:09:02Z", "2023-03-17T13:10:06Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Found as an answer to a proposal PR: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7628#discussion_r1140211918\n\nThe solution is to use `.str.format` the other way around as you propose:\n\nYou can try `das.str.format(da)`. Maybe you need to use `{}` instead of `%` in your format array.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1052753606], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7604#issuecomment-1471425997", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7604", 1471425997, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XtC3N", 43316012, "2023-03-16T07:07:52Z", "2023-03-16T07:07:52Z", "COLLABORATOR", "That issue will be fixed by #7619", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1618789537], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7628#issuecomment-1471413892", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7628", 1471413892, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Xs_6E", 43316012, "2023-03-16T06:53:52Z", "2023-03-16T06:53:52Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Again, I think that this implementation is too specific and the issue wanted a more general string formatting option.\n\nAlso, auch a method is better kept as part of the StrAccessor.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1624520287], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7625#issuecomment-1470829677", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7625", 1470829677, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XqxRt", 43316012, "2023-03-15T20:56:37Z", "2023-03-15T20:56:37Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Could you also merge main again?", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1623949333], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7586#issuecomment-1470782099", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7586", 1470782099, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XqlqT", 43316012, "2023-03-15T20:17:33Z", "2023-03-15T20:17:33Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Could this potentially affect performance?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1610063645], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7628#issuecomment-1469697108", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7628", 1469697108, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XmcxU", 43316012, "2023-03-15T09:57:12Z", "2023-03-15T09:57:12Z", "COLLABORATOR", "By the way, this works (but probably slow?):\n\n```python\n\ndef tostr(x):\n    return f\"{:.2f}\"\n\ntostr_v = np.vectorize(tostr)\n\n\nda = xr.DataArray([1, 2, 3.456], dims=\"x\")\n\ntostr_v(da)\n```", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1624520287], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7628#issuecomment-1469677146", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7628", 1469677146, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XmX5a", 43316012, "2023-03-15T09:43:57Z", "2023-03-15T09:44:33Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Wouldn't it be more useful to have something like `da.str.format(\"sometext: {:2.2f}\")`\n\nOr maybe `da.as_str(...)`", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1624520287], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6914#issuecomment-1466890220", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6914", 1466890220, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85Xbvfs", 43316012, "2023-03-13T20:11:15Z", "2023-03-13T20:11:15Z", "COLLABORATOR", "@melioristic could you reproduce the matplotlib results by setting interpolation?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1338173609], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7372#issuecomment-1466868513", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7372", 1466868513, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XbqMh", 43316012, "2023-03-13T19:56:31Z", "2023-03-13T19:56:31Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Then let's close this issue in favor of #4817", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1486990254], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7385#issuecomment-1466864506", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7385", 1466864506, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XbpN6", 43316012, "2023-03-13T19:53:06Z", "2023-03-13T19:53:06Z", "COLLABORATOR", "@dopplershift does this answer fix your problem?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1499473190], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7612#issuecomment-1465733617", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7612", 1465733617, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XXVHx", 43316012, "2023-03-13T08:50:53Z", "2023-03-13T08:50:53Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> Nice! (at one point we can consider removing `infer_intervals` as this is now also done in matplotlib and cartopy). \n\nYeah, I was wondering why we do this explicitly.\nShould we remove it now already, or is there something that still requires it (like older matplotlib versions etc)?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1620317764], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4114#issuecomment-1465302631", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4114", 1465302631, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XVr5n", 43316012, "2023-03-12T21:20:35Z", "2023-03-12T21:20:35Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I assume this has been resolved then?\r\nIf not, feel free to reopen.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 627805952], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5666#issuecomment-1465290779", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5666", 1465290779, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XVpAb", 43316012, "2023-03-12T20:20:27Z", "2023-03-12T20:20:27Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Thanks for the report and sorry for the late reply :)\r\n\r\nThis is not an issue of xarray but rather netCDF4.\r\nThe corresponding issue can be found here: https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/issues/941\r\nIt seems that there is no solution yet.\r\n\r\nSince it seems that it is a HDF5 issue I don't know if any other backend could fix this issue for you (I tried h5netcdf without success).\r\n\r\nI will close this issue for now since we cannot fix it anyway.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 958557945], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5836#issuecomment-1465235251", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5836", 1465235251, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XVbcz", 43316012, "2023-03-12T15:59:13Z", "2023-03-12T15:59:13Z", "COLLABORATOR", "This is indeed intentional (Now with type hints even more obvious).\r\nI agree that in a jupyter notebook that automatically displays the last return value, this might look confusing.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1013881639], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6244#issuecomment-1465230423", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6244", 1465230423, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XVaRX", 43316012, "2023-03-12T15:38:37Z", "2023-03-12T15:38:37Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Almost all files have `from __future__ import annotations` now and pyupgrade is doing its thing :)", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1125040125], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6870#issuecomment-1465228869", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6870", 1465228869, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XVZ5F", 43316012, "2023-03-12T15:32:01Z", "2023-03-12T15:32:01Z", "COLLABORATOR", "The logic of figuring out what stays and what goes is different in `DataArray` and `Dataset`.\r\n`DataArray` reduces the variable and then kicks out all dims, coords, indexes that don't fit anymore.\r\n`Dataset` tries to do the selection on the fly (and apparently fails to do so).", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1326238990], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6870#issuecomment-1465227486", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6870", 1465227486, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XVZje", 43316012, "2023-03-12T15:25:47Z", "2023-03-12T15:27:31Z", "COLLABORATOR", "This is actually a bug in `Dataset.reduce`, it will drop the time index as well.\r\nSee this example:\r\n```python\r\nda = xr.DataArray([[1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6]], dims=[\"x\", \"y\"], coords={\"x\": [5, 6]})\r\nda.reduce(lambda x, *_, **__: x, dim=\"x\")  # has time coord\r\n\r\nds = xr.Dataset({\"a\": da})\r\nds.reduce(lambda x, *_, **__: x, dim=\"x\")  # lost time coord\r\n```\r\n\r\nProbably the assumtion when writing this code was that the passed function actually reduces the dim.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1326238990], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6990#issuecomment-1465150129", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6990", 1465150129, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XVGqx", 43316012, "2023-03-12T10:17:13Z", "2023-03-12T10:17:13Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Closing for now.\r\nFeel free to reopen or better to comment in the linked issues above.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1361989642], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6877#issuecomment-1465149441", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6877", 1465149441, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XVGgB", 43316012, "2023-03-12T10:14:37Z", "2023-03-12T10:14:37Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Closing for now.\r\nSeems like an upstream issue.\r\nFeel free to reopen if it is still relevant.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1329407773], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1004#issuecomment-1465000306", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1004", 1465000306, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XUiFy", 43316012, "2023-03-11T19:57:40Z", "2023-03-11T19:57:40Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Am I missing something, or is there no `IndexVariable.name` attribute anymore?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 176805500], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7611#issuecomment-1464948290", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7611", 1464948290, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XUVZC", 43316012, "2023-03-11T16:34:50Z", "2023-03-11T16:34:50Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Sounds like a good idea to mention the license and what it means in the documentation.\n\nWe don't assign issues to people, so if you are interested in doing so feel free to open a PR.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1619980197], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7368#issuecomment-1464927490", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7368", 1464927490, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XUQUC", 43316012, "2023-03-11T14:50:02Z", "2023-03-11T14:50:24Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> DataAlignable = TypeVar(\"DataAlignable\", bound=DataWithCoords | Coordinates) -> doesn't work since we cannot mix DataWithCoords and Coordinates when aligning each object (input type = output type)\r\n\r\nI think thats exactly correct.\r\nThe whold idea of using a TypeVar for the inputs means that all inputs must have the same type.\r\n\r\nConsider the following example:\r\n```python\r\nclass A: ...\r\nclass B(A): ...\r\nclass C: ...\r\n\r\nT = TypeVar(\"T\", bound=Union[A, C])\r\ndef f(*x: T) -> T: ...\r\n\r\nf(A(), A())  # OK\r\nf(A(), B())  # OK\r\nf(C(), C())  # OK\r\nf(A(), C())  # not ok, because the common type of A and C is object\r\n```\r\nAlso: sorry for the late reply.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1485037066], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7336#issuecomment-1464386387", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7336", 1464386387, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XSMNT", 43316012, "2023-03-10T20:32:50Z", "2023-03-10T20:32:50Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Closing this issue now as completed. Discussion about documentation can be continued in #7344 ", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1468838643], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7344#issuecomment-1464384781", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7344", 1464384781, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XSL0N", 43316012, "2023-03-10T20:31:28Z", "2023-03-10T20:31:28Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Maybe it is just a problem of documenting it more clearly?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1471685307], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5762#issuecomment-1464348270", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5762", 1464348270, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XSC5u", 43316012, "2023-03-10T20:01:18Z", "2023-03-10T20:01:18Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Closing this issue in favor of #7593 since the provided MVCE in this issue now works.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 987551524], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7199#issuecomment-1464331562", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7199", 1464331562, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XR-0q", 43316012, "2023-03-10T19:49:10Z", "2023-03-10T19:49:10Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Any ideas on how to deprecate this?\r\nDo we raise a Deprecation warning if someone uses the open_dataset method of the internal backend?\r\nAnd then remove it some versions down the line?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1419825696], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7521#issuecomment-1462773338", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7521", 1462773338, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XMCZa", 43316012, "2023-03-09T20:44:04Z", "2023-03-09T20:44:04Z", "COLLABORATOR", "It seems that numpy is somewhat against this change, so maybe we are better off to restore the previous state to not have a mess with supporting different numpy versions again.\r\nLets keep that in mind before the next release but wait if something changes on numpys side.", "{\"total_count\": 2, \"+1\": 2, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1580266844], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7600#issuecomment-1462760816", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7600", 1462760816, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XL_Vw", 43316012, "2023-03-09T20:40:25Z", "2023-03-09T20:40:25Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Ok :)\r\nBut I guess it is better to not merge this then, it will only create messy merge conflicts for other PRs.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1615980379], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3607#issuecomment-1462754116", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3607", 1462754116, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XL9tE", 43316012, "2023-03-09T20:37:18Z", "2023-03-09T20:37:18Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Is that still wanted?\r\nIt seems like a useful feature to have.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 535686852], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7578#issuecomment-1462752419", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7578", 1462752419, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XL9Sj", 43316012, "2023-03-09T20:36:31Z", "2023-03-09T20:36:31Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Good spot. The fix seems good to me.\r\nIf you fix the tests and add a whats-new this is good to go", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1607502760], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7598#issuecomment-1460859161", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7598", 1460859161, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85XEvEZ", 43316012, "2023-03-08T20:50:46Z", "2023-03-08T20:50:46Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> As a newcomer, a short general question: The 'Contributing' guide mentions to document changes in `whats-new.rst`. Shall this be done by the developer or are you (the maintainers) doing this once the PR is merged into the main branch?\r\n> \r\n> (Since at the time of requesting, I can`t know when (or if) the issue will be merged).\r\n\r\nUsually this is done by the developer/contributor. You can just copy a similar entry and adopt it to yourself in the newest section, you have basically full freedom :)", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1615645463], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7521#issuecomment-1450819830", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7521", 1450819830, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WecD2", 43316012, "2023-03-01T20:44:52Z", "2023-03-01T20:44:52Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I have opened https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/23308\n\nIt should be an easy change on numpys side if they decide to go for it.\nOnly problem, we again have to special case this based on bumpy version, haha.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1580266844], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7519#issuecomment-1449430920", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7519", 1449430920, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WZI-I", 43316012, "2023-03-01T06:34:48Z", "2023-03-01T06:35:08Z", "COLLABORATOR", "> Should we special case a solution? Seems user-friendly to do so.\n\nI think dict_keys is its own type so with some type ignore this could work.", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1579956621], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7521#issuecomment-1449428744", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7521", 1449428744, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WZIcI", 43316012, "2023-03-01T06:31:46Z", "2023-03-01T06:31:46Z", "COLLABORATOR", "\n> Do you know if there's a plan to make something like this public on the numpy end?\n\nNo idea, the static typing of numpy is still changing a lot and has many bugs (same with xarray, haha).\n\nI'm sure they will make it public is we request it.\n\n", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1580266844], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3980#issuecomment-1449013427", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3980", 1449013427, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WXjCz", 43316012, "2023-02-28T22:24:56Z", "2023-02-28T22:24:56Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I will not be able to join tomorrow, so here are my thoughts on this topic:\n\n- How to work with subclassed Datasets that should return DataArrays? I think the pandas approach is good, we add `Dataset.dataarray_cls = DataArray` and `DataArray.dataset_cls = Dataset` which subclasses can overwrite.\n- How to deal with subclasses that change the constructor aka. `__init__`? Probably we need to introduce a kind of shortcut constructor that will be called instead in functions that create new instances (right now the subclass needs the same constructor signature as xarrays version). But then custom instance attributes will not be set etc. Not sure what is the best approach here.\n- Is the whole thing limited to DataArrays and Datasets or can one also subclass Variables?", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 602218021], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7552#issuecomment-1447067702", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7552", 1447067702, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WQIA2", 43316012, "2023-02-27T20:50:13Z", "2023-02-27T20:50:13Z", "COLLABORATOR", "@liorella-qm in the meantime you can use `da.plot.line(col='y')` as a workaround", "{\"total_count\": 1, \"+1\": 1, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1596890616], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7552#issuecomment-1447057892", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7552", 1447057892, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WQFnk", 43316012, "2023-02-27T20:43:00Z", "2023-02-27T20:48:19Z", "COLLABORATOR", "This is caused by the `squeeze()` here: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/41949209b6cfb0d5c25d000b1e0c5739b513385c/xarray/plot/dataarray_plot.py#L267\r\n\r\n@Illviljan do you know why this is required? I assume you want to remove singleton dimensions to better choose the correct plot method?\r\n\r\nMaybe we should exclude col, row dims from the squeeze?\r\nsomething like:\r\n`darray.squeeze(d for d, s in darray.sizes.items() if s == 1 and d not in (row, col, hue)) `", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1596890616], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7516#issuecomment-1447037080", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7516", 1447037080, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WQAiY", 43316012, "2023-02-27T20:27:52Z", "2023-02-27T20:27:52Z", "COLLABORATOR", "I am a bit puzzled here...\r\nThe dask graph looks identical, so it must be the way the indexers are constructed.\r\n\r\nThe major difference I can find is:\r\nThe old version used `np.unique` while the new version uses xarrays `cond.any(..)`\r\n\r\nMaybe someone with more experience in dask can help out?", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1575938277], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7516#issuecomment-1445469752", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7516", 1445469752, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WKB44", 43316012, "2023-02-26T21:16:35Z", "2023-02-26T21:16:35Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Git bisect pinpoints this to https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6690 which funny enough, is my PR haha.\r\nI will look into it when I find time :)", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1575938277], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7516#issuecomment-1445467918", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7516", 1445467918, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WKBcO", 43316012, "2023-02-26T21:07:56Z", "2023-02-26T21:07:56Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Can confirm, on my machine it went from 520ms to 5s", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1575938277], ["https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7513#issuecomment-1445457887", "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7513", 1445457887, "IC_kwDOAMm_X85WJ-_f", 43316012, "2023-02-26T20:21:23Z", "2023-02-26T20:21:23Z", "COLLABORATOR", "Not sure if related, but this also randomly failed (different error though):\r\nhttps://github.com/pydata/xarray/actions/runs/4276072684/jobs/7443939252", "{\"total_count\": 0, \"+1\": 0, \"-1\": 0, \"laugh\": 0, \"hooray\": 0, \"confused\": 0, \"heart\": 0, \"rocket\": 0, \"eyes\": 0}", null, 1574694462]], "truncated": false, "filtered_table_rows_count": 480, "expanded_columns": [], "expandable_columns": [[{"column": "issue", "other_table": "issues", "other_column": "id"}, "title"], [{"column": "user", "other_table": "users", "other_column": "id"}, "login"]], "columns": ["html_url", "issue_url", "id", "node_id", "user", "created_at", "updated_at", "author_association", "body", "reactions", "performed_via_github_app", "issue"], "primary_keys": ["id"], "units": {}, "query": {"sql": "select html_url, issue_url, id, node_id, user, created_at, updated_at, author_association, body, reactions, performed_via_github_app, issue from issue_comments where \"author_association\" = :p0 order by updated_at desc limit 101", "params": {"p0": "COLLABORATOR"}}, "facet_results": {}, "suggested_facets": [], "next": "2023-02-26T20~3A21~3A23Z,1445457887", "next_url": "http://xarray-datasette.fly.dev/github/issue_comments.json?author_association=COLLABORATOR&_next=2023-02-26T20~3A21~3A23Z%2C1445457887&_sort_desc=updated_at", "private": false, "allow_execute_sql": true, "query_ms": 7601.423694999539}