html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3232#issuecomment-1190382681,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3232,1190382681,IC_kwDOAMm_X85G88xZ,4441865,2022-07-20T14:48:15Z,2022-07-20T14:48:15Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Makes sense, then I'll wait for https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/58743 to try it.","{""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,482543307
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3232#issuecomment-1190068100,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3232,1190068100,IC_kwDOAMm_X85G7v-E,4441865,2022-07-20T09:50:59Z,2022-07-20T09:50:59Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Nice that it's so simple. I think it can't be tested with pytorch until they compete https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/issues/58743, right?

Or we should just try passing `torch.tensor` into xarray directly?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,482543307
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3232#issuecomment-1189938517,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3232,1189938517,IC_kwDOAMm_X85G7QVV,4441865,2022-07-20T07:42:05Z,2022-07-20T07:42:05Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Glad to see progress on this!! 👏 

Just curious though, seeing this comment in the PR:

> Note: I haven't actually tested this with pytorch (which is the motivating example for https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3232).

Are we sure this closes the issue? And, how can we try it out? Even lacking docs, a comment explaining how to set it up would be great, and I can do some testing on my end. I understand that it's an experimental feature.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 1, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,482543307
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3081#issuecomment-509022657,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3081,509022657,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwOTAyMjY1Nw==,4441865,2019-07-07T18:57:25Z,2019-07-07T18:57:25Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"That's fair. If this hasn't come up before, it must not be bothering too many people. Maybe I'll write a `DataArray.op` accessor.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,464717028
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1281#issuecomment-282146064,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1281,282146064,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MjE0NjA2NA==,4441865,2017-02-23T22:43:10Z,2017-02-23T22:43:10Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"FWIW I've been doing

    def update_attrs(obj, *args, **kwargs):
        obj.attrs.update(*args, **kwargs)
        return obj

    ds.pipe(update_attrs, foo='bar')

which, yeah, is not too painful. But when I find myself using it every time I use xarray it makes me wish it was included.

A lambda solution is more difficult (maybe impossible?) because you need to update the attrs *and* return the original object to continue the pipe.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,209523348
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1281#issuecomment-281908185,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1281,281908185,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4MTkwODE4NQ==,4441865,2017-02-23T06:36:18Z,2017-02-23T06:36:18Z,CONTRIBUTOR,Thanks for the tip. I'll give it a shot.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,209523348