html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2659#issuecomment-462940017,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2659,462940017,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2Mjk0MDAxNw==,13939,2019-02-12T21:21:13Z,2019-02-12T21:21:13Z,NONE,If you are interested I could implement an `xarray -> cf-json -> xarray` round-trip. It will be a bit different from `to_dict` in terms of carrying through variable and attribute types so the file can be re-produced from the JSON. They both have their use-cases!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,396501063
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/917#issuecomment-254223358,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/917,254223358,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDIyMzM1OA==,13939,2016-10-17T14:28:23Z,2016-10-17T14:28:23Z,NONE,"Before I looked at the code I assumed it was going to convert... but that's just me!

As it stands a custom encoder is needed to get a JSON dump from the output, which will be a fairly common use case for this function. See https://gist.github.com/kwilcox/c41834297b1a3b732cae3ee16621f6d0.

In the least maybe a little note in the documentation on how to dump the `to_dict` output to JSON (you also need to include `decode_times=False` because datetime objects are not JSON serializable either).
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,167091064
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/917#issuecomment-254218699,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/917,254218699,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1NDIxODY5OQ==,13939,2016-10-17T14:11:58Z,2016-10-17T14:11:58Z,NONE,"@jsignell was the intention to have only python scalars/lists in the dictionary (no numpy generics or arrays)?  Right now attribute values are not being converted and results in a mixed `dict` of the data as a list but attributes still in numpy form.  Thoughts?
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,167091064
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/844#issuecomment-217163460,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/844,217163460,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxNzE2MzQ2MA==,13939,2016-05-05T14:05:39Z,2016-05-05T14:05:56Z,NONE,"@ocefpaf I agree that keeping the xarray model consistent should take precedence. I also use this method to (mostly) pull out coordinate variables and can continue to use netCDF4.Dataset to do that.
","{""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,153126324