html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5622#issuecomment-983728169,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5622,983728169,IC_kwDOAMm_X846ooAp,10194086,2021-12-01T15:02:59Z,2021-12-01T15:02:59Z,MEMBER,Not sure if this is too naïve from my side but can you just pass N+1 levels to the function?,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,948049609
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5622#issuecomment-890044593,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5622,890044593,IC_kwDOAMm_X841DQCx,10194086,2021-07-30T17:29:24Z,2021-07-30T17:29:24Z,MEMBER,"> Would be easy if we could just force named arguments?

Yes that would be a good idea. A deprecation would be nice but for the backends refactor (`open_dataset`) this directly became an error.

> For example an acccidentally inverted plot didn't crash the tests.

Good you noticed - I also think the plotting tests are not comprehensive.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,948049609