html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5560#issuecomment-872627259,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5560,872627259,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3MjYyNzI1OQ==,5635139,2021-07-02T00:20:32Z,2021-07-02T00:20:32Z,MEMBER,"Nice!

pandas [uses](https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/reference/api/pandas.set_option.html) `use_bottleneck` — and same for numba / numexpr.

To what extent would bottleneck & numba be mutually exclusive? Until everything is implemented in numbagg, I guess they won't be, and we might want separate options. Having a single option would be nicer otherwise.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,935279688