html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5553#issuecomment-877736473,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5553,877736473,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3NzczNjQ3Mw==,1217238,2021-07-11T03:47:12Z,2021-07-11T03:47:12Z,MEMBER,"At the very least, I do think we need something like option 3. We don't want to be in a scenario where indexes can easily get out of sync.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,933551030
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5553#issuecomment-877736416,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5553,877736416,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3NzczNjQxNg==,1217238,2021-07-11T03:46:04Z,2021-07-11T03:46:04Z,MEMBER,"Would we _need_ to duplicate data with option 1? It seems like a wrapper that makes the data in a Variable immutable might resolve that? We could even compute the variable's data on the fly using Xarray's lazy indexing machinery.

I was initially leaning towards 2 due to cleaner handling of ""virtual"" coordinates, but I'm not so sure that that would actually help anymore.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,933551030