html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5441#issuecomment-867735473,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5441,867735473,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg2NzczNTQ3Mw==,5635139,2021-06-24T15:33:29Z,2021-06-24T15:33:29Z,MEMBER,Thanks @keewis !!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,912518003
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5441#issuecomment-867686353,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5441,867686353,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg2NzY4NjM1Mw==,14808389,2021-06-24T14:33:16Z,2021-06-24T14:33:44Z,MEMBER,"looking at the logs, it seems the test result files are downloaded to `test-results/Test results/` instead of `test-results/`. I guess we either need a extra step that moves them to the correct place or use `test-results/**/*` instead of `test-results/*` as the file pattern","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,912518003
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5441#issuecomment-855430813,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5441,855430813,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg1NTQzMDgxMw==,14808389,2021-06-06T17:11:08Z,2021-06-06T17:11:08Z,MEMBER,"sounds good, and I think leaving it should be fine for now.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,912518003
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5441#issuecomment-855424358,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5441,855424358,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg1NTQyNDM1OA==,5635139,2021-06-06T16:23:52Z,2021-06-06T16:23:52Z,MEMBER,"Yeah. I was thinking it may be running on the base of the feature branch, and so required branching off a newer version of master. But I'm guessing this is a PR that was branched of the most recent version of master, and so there is an actual problem.

I'll do another turn at the end of this week (I think it's OK to leave in this state for a few days but let me know if you disagree and happy to remove it in the meantime). Thanks for spotting @keewis .","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,912518003
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5441#issuecomment-855380369,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5441,855380369,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg1NTM4MDM2OQ==,14808389,2021-06-06T11:04:25Z,2021-06-06T11:04:25Z,MEMBER,"@max-sixty, the bot seems a bit broken: it only runs after merging, and it checks the merge commit against itself (if I'm understanding that message correctly).","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,912518003
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5441#issuecomment-855372883,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5441,855372883,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg1NTM3Mjg4Mw==,41898282,2021-06-06T10:05:45Z,2021-06-06T10:05:45Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"## Unit Test Results
0 files  ±0  0 suites  ±0   0s :stopwatch: ±0s
0 tests ±0  0 :heavy_check_mark: ±0  0 :zzz: ±0  0 :x: ±0 

Results for commit e96f860d. ± Comparison against base commit e96f860d.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,912518003