html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5384#issuecomment-849733928,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5384,849733928,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0OTczMzkyOA==,4160723,2021-05-27T15:35:18Z,2021-05-27T15:35:18Z,MEMBER,"This should be fixed in #5385.

Side note: the example you gave here, i.e.,

```python
ds = Dataset({'d': DataArray(c.data, dims=['c'])}, coords=c.coords)
ds = ds.unstack(['c'])
```

should probably be depreciated after the index refactoring in Xarray (currently WIP), which aims to decouple the concepts of coordinates vs. indexes. More specifically, indexes shouldn't be passed implicitly via the `coords` argument of the `Dataset`/`DataArray` constructors anymore, but instead explicitly via the `indexes` argument (see https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/master/design_notes/flexible_indexes_notes.md#22-explicit-vs-implicit-index-creation).","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,903055859
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5384#issuecomment-849602816,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5384,849602816,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0OTYwMjgxNg==,4160723,2021-05-27T12:44:08Z,2021-05-27T12:44:08Z,MEMBER,This has been introduced in #5102. I'm looking into it.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,903055859