html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5375#issuecomment-848783812,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5375,848783812,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0ODc4MzgxMg==,198999,2021-05-26T13:46:33Z,2021-05-26T13:46:33Z,NONE,"> > Well, it seems more like a workaround than a solution, but be it.
> 
> It was proposed by @dcherian in [#5341 (comment)](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5341#issuecomment-844105683)

My point (completely irrelevant to this issue) is that I haven’t seen anywhere the real analysis what is wrong with the original command, and the assertion was just loosened to make the test pass without it. But it really doesn't matter for me.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,901856178
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5375#issuecomment-848553713,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5375,848553713,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0ODU1MzcxMw==,198999,2021-05-26T07:56:26Z,2021-05-26T07:58:04Z,NONE,"Well, it seems more like a workaround than a solution, but be it. Thank you. And of course, #5364 doesn’t do anything with `test_interpolate_1d[1-x-linear]` for which you have a patch here.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,901856178