html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4979#issuecomment-789146762,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4979,789146762,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4OTE0Njc2Mg==,3460034,2021-03-02T19:13:38Z,2021-03-02T19:13:38Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"It's great to be able to follow along with the discussion here! I'm definitely interested in seeing where the duck array index support ends up.

One use-case motivated question: the flexible indexes refactoring has also been pointed to as the resolution to https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2233, where multidimensional coordinates have the same name as one of their dimensions. I wasn't quite able to tell through the narrative here if that has been addressed along the way yet or not (""A. only 1D coordinates with a name matching their dimension name"" for implicit index creation does seem to get close though). So, would it be worth directly addressing https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2233 here, or should that wait?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,819062172