html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4355#issuecomment-676746088,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4355,676746088,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3Njc0NjA4OA==,5635139,2020-08-19T22:03:05Z,2020-08-19T22:03:05Z,MEMBER,"> re contributing docs: would it be best to leave that to the planned docs overhaul?

For sure, I didn't mean to weigh down this PR","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,682040124
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4355#issuecomment-676708744,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4355,676708744,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3NjcwODc0NA==,5635139,2020-08-19T21:15:47Z,2020-08-19T21:15:47Z,MEMBER,"Agree with these changes, thanks @keewis 

Stepping back on the contributing doc — I admit I haven't look at it in a while — I wonder whether we can slim it down a bit, for example by linking to other docs for generic tooling — I imagine we're unlikely to have the best docs on working with GH, for example. Or referencing our PR template rather than the (now out-of-date) PR checklist.","{""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,682040124