html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3685#issuecomment-577386737,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3685,577386737,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NzM4NjczNw==,2448579,2020-01-22T21:09:39Z,2020-01-22T21:09:39Z,MEMBER,Great. Thanks @juseg. I've run into this before so it's nice to see it fixed.,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,548413554
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3685#issuecomment-577121575,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3685,577121575,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NzEyMTU3NQ==,1186928,2020-01-22T10:43:41Z,2020-01-22T10:43:41Z,CONTRIBUTOR,@dcherian Do you mean merge #3274 here (not sure what's the best workflow)? Also am I correct this will break compatibility with matplotlib<3.1? I think I'm done otherwise.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,548413554
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3685#issuecomment-575668526,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3685,575668526,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NTY2ODUyNg==,2448579,2020-01-17T15:19:52Z,2020-01-17T15:19:52Z,MEMBER,"Not sure there is a good difference. It looks like some refactoring may be a good idea. For now I would just stick the test wherever it is easiest.

Also this may be a good time to incorporate the changes from #3274","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,548413554
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3685#issuecomment-575643859,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3685,575643859,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3NTY0Mzg1OQ==,1186928,2020-01-17T14:18:23Z,2020-01-17T14:18:23Z,CONTRIBUTOR,@dcherian could you please briefly explain the difference between `class TestPlot` and `class TestPlot1D` or point me to docs on that?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,548413554
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3685#issuecomment-573305245,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3685,573305245,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3MzMwNTI0NQ==,1186928,2020-01-11T10:45:49Z,2020-01-11T10:53:59Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"@dcherian Thanks for pointing the problematic code (in #3571). This commit (b8f082b) solves the issue, I think. Or do you think it will be cleaner with a new util `_resolve_intervals_1dplot` (similar to the existing `_resolve_intervals_2dplot`)?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,548413554