html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3514#issuecomment-553573320,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3514,553573320,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MzU3MzMyMA==,5635139,2019-11-13T19:52:18Z,2019-11-13T19:52:18Z,MEMBER,"> By reading the implementation of cachedproperty, it needs a `__dict__`. It should be straightforward to write a variant that uses slots though.

Is there a way of doing that which doesn't nullify the benefits of slots? i.e. if we add a `_cache_dict` to the class, is that the same overhead as having a `__dict__`?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,521754870
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3514#issuecomment-553093801,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3514,553093801,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MzA5MzgwMQ==,5635139,2019-11-12T20:11:22Z,2019-11-12T20:11:35Z,MEMBER,"Great, I didn't know about that, thanks

It does remind me, though, that I'm not sure it's possible given we're using `__slots__`, at least without adding an entry to `__slots__`...
https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/d360346640e19231032b072216195484fa2450b4/Lib/functools.py#L954-L958
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,521754870