html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3377#issuecomment-541025099,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3377,541025099,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MTAyNTA5OQ==,14314623,2019-10-11T11:25:26Z,2019-10-11T11:25:26Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Glad that this orphaned test (we ended up removing it, because the function was not called anymore) was still useful! 

And many thanks to @dcherian for suggesting to test xgxm with the upstream master!

<sub>Sent with <a href=""http://githawk.com"">GitHawk</a></sub>","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,503562032
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3377#issuecomment-540928701,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3377,540928701,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MDkyODcwMQ==,1217238,2019-10-11T06:25:08Z,2019-10-11T06:25:08Z,MEMBER,"@jbusecke kudos to you for catching this so early, before we even made a release!

https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3393 should fix the immediate issue, though it's a pretty awkward fix.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 1, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,503562032
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3377#issuecomment-540917530,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3377,540917530,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MDkxNzUzMA==,1217238,2019-10-11T05:45:43Z,2019-10-11T05:45:43Z,MEMBER,"Yes, it was definitely my explicit indexes refactor. Apparently this wasn't tested?

Here's a simpler reproduction:
```python
import xarray as xr
ds = xr.Dataset({""x"": [0, 1, 2]})
ds[""x""] = ds[""x""][:2]
assert ds.sizes[""x""] == 2, ds
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,503562032
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3377#issuecomment-540886056,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3377,540886056,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MDg4NjA1Ng==,2443309,2019-10-11T03:32:45Z,2019-10-11T03:32:45Z,MEMBER,I looked into this a bit tonight. I think this may be related to @shoyer's recent explicit indexes refactor (#3234). I'm having trouble following some of the new logic but it seems we're not updating the size of the `x_c` dimension during the `__setitem__` step in @jbusecke's example. I have a PR coming with a regression test -- #3392. ,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,503562032
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3377#issuecomment-539105764,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3377,539105764,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzOTEwNTc2NA==,5635139,2019-10-07T16:53:46Z,2019-10-07T16:53:46Z,MEMBER,"Thanks for submitting. Confirmed. I couldn't work out the cause quickly, can have another look later; unless anyone knows immediately.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,503562032