html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3256#issuecomment-565183733,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3256,565183733,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NTE4MzczMw==,221526,2019-12-12T20:57:56Z,2019-12-12T20:57:56Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Yeah, it's not much shorter, but it's a much easier concept for new users to grasp, IMO.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484699415
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3256#issuecomment-564633712,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3256,564633712,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2NDYzMzcxMg==,3460034,2019-12-11T16:50:33Z,2019-12-11T16:50:33Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Would it make sense to add something to the `dt` accessor, such `as_datetime`? @dopplershift's example would still be somewhat verbose, but it seems more sensible:

```python
times[0].dt.as_datetime().item()
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484699415
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3256#issuecomment-563511116,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3256,563511116,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2MzUxMTExNg==,221526,2019-12-10T01:00:00Z,2019-12-10T01:00:00Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Well it'd be nice to have something, because what we have to do right now is:
```python
times[0].values.astype('datetime64[ms]').astype('O')
```
which is an abomination and terrible for teaching.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484699415
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3256#issuecomment-524516807,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3256,524516807,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNDUxNjgwNw==,1217238,2019-08-24T03:58:15Z,2019-08-24T03:58:15Z,MEMBER,"This is basically a direct manifestation of this NumPy bug: https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/12550

We could potentially had a workaround in xarray but it would be good to figure out the NumPy fix first, so we can be consistent.","{""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484699415