html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3244#issuecomment-525404314,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3244,525404314,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNTQwNDMxNA==,13190237,2019-08-27T17:31:41Z,2019-08-27T17:31:41Z,CONTRIBUTOR,Thanks guys!,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484212164
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3244#issuecomment-525396502,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3244,525396502,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNTM5NjUwMg==,1217238,2019-08-27T17:11:40Z,2019-08-27T17:11:40Z,MEMBER,"We recommend using ""merge master"". It looks like our contributor guidelines
need to be updated here so don't hesitate to ask any questions.
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 8:53 AM ulijh wrote:
> May be this is a stupid question: What's the best way to resolve this
> conflict, and get the checks to run? Should I do a merge master? Or rebase
> (seems somewhat of a pain to get the remote up to date)? Thanks for the
> advice!
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> ,
> or mute the thread
>
> .
>
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484212164
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3244#issuecomment-525367937,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3244,525367937,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNTM2NzkzNw==,2448579,2019-08-27T15:59:16Z,2019-08-27T15:59:16Z,MEMBER,Merge master is enough. I just did it to kick off the tests.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484212164
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3244#issuecomment-525365481,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3244,525365481,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNTM2NTQ4MQ==,13190237,2019-08-27T15:53:46Z,2019-08-27T15:53:46Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"May be this is a stupid question: What's the best way to resolve this conflict, and get the checks to run? Should I do a merge master? Or rebase (seems somewhat of a pain to get the remote up to date)? Thanks for the advice!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484212164
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3244#issuecomment-524277968,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3244,524277968,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNDI3Nzk2OA==,13190237,2019-08-23T11:19:45Z,2019-08-23T11:21:03Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Guys, if you could have a look at the tests I modified (a4c3622) to check how many times things get computed. I tried to integrate it with the existing tests. The number of count check could possibly be applied to some other tests as well. May be there is a smarter way of doing this?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484212164
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3244#issuecomment-524078960,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3244,524078960,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNDA3ODk2MA==,13190237,2019-08-22T21:10:27Z,2019-08-22T21:10:27Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Thanks @max-sixty! Sure, I'll do this tomorrow then.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484212164
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3244#issuecomment-524077985,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3244,524077985,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNDA3Nzk4NQ==,5635139,2019-08-22T21:07:15Z,2019-08-22T21:07:15Z,MEMBER,"This looks good @ulijh ! Thanks
Could you add a test? Also feel free to give yourself credit in a whatsnew","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,484212164