html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-875136135,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,875136135,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3NTEzNjEzNQ==,13301940,2021-07-06T22:57:29Z,2021-07-06T22:57:29Z,MEMBER,"@rabernat, the gentlest of bumps on this :)... How much work (content) is left to bring this to completion? I'm asking because I'd be happy to help if there's still more work and/or follow-up PR needed.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-637570480,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,637570480,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzU3MDQ4MA==,2448579,2020-06-02T14:13:44Z,2020-06-02T14:13:44Z,MEMBER,Thanks @keewis !,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-637545516,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,637545516,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzU0NTUxNg==,14808389,2020-06-02T13:33:31Z,2020-06-02T13:33:31Z,MEMBER,"@rabernat, I did the rebase for this and #3111, so when you eventually pick this up again, a simple merge should get this up-to-date with `master`","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-511253002,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,511253002,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTI1MzAwMg==,22429695,2019-07-15T01:32:30Z,2020-06-02T13:24:36Z,NONE,"# [Codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/pydata/xarray/pull/3131?src=pr&el=h1) Report
> Merging [#3131](https://codecov.io/gh/pydata/xarray/pull/3131?src=pr&el=desc) into [scipy19-docs](https://codecov.io/gh/pydata/xarray/commit/1faf67c6e1e86929ca16cfa7c9485300627e591c&el=desc) will **decrease** coverage by `0.16%`.
> The diff coverage is `n/a`.
```diff
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## scipy19-docs #3131 +/- ##
================================================
- Coverage 96.18% 96.02% -0.17%
================================================
Files 66 63 -3
Lines 13858 12799 -1059
================================================
- Hits 13330 12290 -1040
+ Misses 528 509 -19
```
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-630228624,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,630228624,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMDIyODYyNA==,14808389,2020-05-18T14:42:08Z,2020-05-18T14:42:33Z,MEMBER,"we should rebase this and #3111 onto `master` so we don't depend on the old `scipy19-docs` branch. If we want to continue having a separate development branch for documentation, I think we should use one that is kept in sync with current master.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-630209431,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,630209431,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMDIwOTQzMQ==,14808389,2020-05-18T14:13:06Z,2020-05-18T14:13:06Z,MEMBER,"err, sorry, no. That happened because I deleted the branch you tried to merge into. Let me try to fix that.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-630208018,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,630208018,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMDIwODAxOA==,1197350,2020-05-18T14:10:34Z,2020-05-18T14:10:34Z,MEMBER,I am still hoping to finish this one day. Any reason it needs to be closed?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-512355490,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,512355490,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMjM1NTQ5MA==,1217238,2019-07-17T16:28:31Z,2019-07-17T16:28:31Z,MEMBER,It is possible that we do actually need a third combine mode that works like the old `auto_combine`.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-512353104,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,512353104,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMjM1MzEwNA==,35968931,2019-07-17T16:22:26Z,2019-07-17T16:22:26Z,MEMBER,"Nor am I. I originally thought it should be 'nested' because the
concat-in-order behaviour is more similar to the original auto_combine, but
I don't know.
It seems to me like it depends on the quality of user's data: if they have
high-quality datasets which already have sensible coordinates for each
dimension then' by_coords' is best, but if their data is more primitive
without coordinates (like mine happens to be) then 'nested' is the most
natural default. So do we have a sense of what the largest number of users
would find most natural? Or is this not a good way to think about it?
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019, 16:05 Stephan Hoyer, wrote:
> I think ""by_coords"" is probably the most user friendly default for
> open_mfdataset? But I'm not entirely sure...
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were assigned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> ,
> or mute the thread
>
> .
>
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-512296380,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131,512296380,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMjI5NjM4MA==,1217238,2019-07-17T15:05:47Z,2019-07-17T15:05:47Z,MEMBER,"I think ""by_coords"" is probably the most user friendly default for open_mfdataset? But I'm not entirely sure...","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,467908830