html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-504078924,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028,504078924,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDA3ODkyNA==,5852283,2019-06-20T15:46:59Z,2019-06-20T15:46:59Z,CONTRIBUTOR,Sounds great. Thanks for making this a smooth and well documented process for new contributors ,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,456971151
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-504069867,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028,504069867,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNDA2OTg2Nw==,1217238,2019-06-20T15:24:19Z,2019-06-20T15:24:19Z,MEMBER,"OK, I'm going to go ahead and merge after tests pass!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,456971151
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503553184,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028,503553184,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzU1MzE4NA==,5852283,2019-06-19T13:08:41Z,2019-06-19T13:08:41Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"I have to say as someone who is probably an average user, inconsistencies between related projects, like xarray/pandas or matplotlib/seaborn, drive me nuts. But I also agree that `missing=` is more descriptive, and if we were starting from scratch I would totally support that. So I will defer to the maintainers here. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,456971151
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503241583,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028,503241583,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzI0MTU4Mw==,5635139,2019-06-18T17:49:03Z,2019-06-18T17:49:03Z,MEMBER,"> One design question: should we stick with errors='ignore' like pandas, or would it be better to use a more self-descriptive argument name like missing='ignore'/missing='raise'?

I'm ambivalent. I prefer the `missing=`, but I'm more 'in it' than the average user, who would probably prefer consistency. If people / @shoyer vote that `missing=` is materially better, let's change","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,456971151
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3028#issuecomment-503189754,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3028,503189754,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwMzE4OTc1NA==,1217238,2019-06-18T15:33:50Z,2019-06-18T15:33:50Z,MEMBER,"This looks great, thank you!

One design question: should we stick with `errors='ignore'` like pandas, or would it be better to use a more self-descriptive argument name like `missing='ignore'`/`missing='raise'`?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,456971151