html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2909#issuecomment-495302866,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2909,495302866,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NTMwMjg2Ng==,35968931,2019-05-23T17:04:19Z,2019-05-23T17:04:19Z,MEMBER,"> But do we have to build the docs for non-pandas users as well? It could make quite a few things redundant with the pandas documentation...

I personally think we should. I think there are a very large number of numpy users who don't use pandas or any labelled data libraries at all, who cannot be assumed to know what Pandas does. I definitely didn't understand what the references to Pandas meant when I first read xarray's documentation, and everyone else in my field seems to fit in this category at least... ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,435330735
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2909#issuecomment-486999992,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2909,486999992,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4Njk5OTk5Mg==,10050469,2019-04-26T09:51:38Z,2019-04-26T09:51:38Z,MEMBER,">  too many references to pandas!

This is a tricky one. In the beginning we wanted people to come from pandas to xarray. It was kind of assumed that everybody uses and loves pandas, therefore will also use and love xarray. (my own experience). 

But do we have to build the docs for non-pandas users as well? It could make quite a few things redundant with the pandas documentation...","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,435330735