html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-469067311,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777,469067311,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2OTA2NzMxMQ==,12229877,2019-03-03T21:41:21Z,2019-03-03T21:41:21Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"No objection to going with #2792; I'm just happy to have the change merged 😄 It would be nice for someone to cherry-pick 63da214d697345ebdd0ecc0967c72eafc70bcb0d before releasing 0.12 though, just to fix that warning.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,411755105 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-467667604,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777,467667604,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NzY2NzYwNA==,12229877,2019-02-27T00:07:34Z,2019-02-27T00:07:34Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> maybe you have a syntax error? ...yep, an unmatched paren. 😥 > If `a` and `b` have the same name, then you'd get an index with the two duplicate entries in the second case but not the first case. [which would be bad] I think it's impossible to avoid this when using inference in the general case. Two options I think would be decent-if-unsatisfying: 1. Explicitly manage this in the new combining functions, e.g. clear the concat dim coords if they are not unique and the input arrays did not have coords in that dimension. 2. Add an argument to `xr.concat` to enable or disable this, e.g. `infer_coords=True`, and disable it when calling `xr.concat` from other combining functions.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,411755105 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-466587431,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777,466587431,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NjU4NzQzMQ==,12229877,2019-02-22T23:47:30Z,2019-02-22T23:47:30Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"@shoyer - don't worry about the docs build, I'm pretty sure that was just a flaky network from Travis and it's working now in any case. I've left `tutorial.load_dataset` in, just changed ""removed in 0.12"" to ""removed in a future version"".","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,411755105 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-466369284,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777,466369284,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NjM2OTI4NA==,12229877,2019-02-22T11:41:37Z,2019-02-22T11:41:37Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"OK! @shoyer, I've got everything passing and it's ready for review. Even the accidental tutorial/docs fixes :smile: ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,411755105 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-465812738,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777,465812738,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NTgxMjczOA==,12229877,2019-02-21T00:32:10Z,2019-02-21T00:32:10Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Hmm, it looks like the failure to download [the naturalearth coastlines.zip](http://naciscdn.org/naturalearth/10m/physical/ne_10m_coastline.zip) wasn't so transient after all - but it *does* work on my machine!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,411755105 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-465802643,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777,465802643,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NTgwMjY0Mw==,12229877,2019-02-20T23:51:04Z,2019-02-20T23:51:15Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"The docs build failed due to a (transient) http error when loading tutorial data for the docs, so I've also finalised the planned conversion from `xarray.tutorial.load_dataset` to `xarray.tutorial.open_dataset`.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,411755105 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2777#issuecomment-465029759,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2777,465029759,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2NTAyOTc1OQ==,12229877,2019-02-19T08:11:56Z,2019-02-19T08:11:56Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Thanks for the support and quick review @shoyer! Any idea when Xarray 0.12 might be out? I'm teaching some remote sensing workshops in mid-March and would love to have this merged, as a colleague's review of those notebooks prompted this PR 😄 ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,411755105