html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2754#issuecomment-462098888,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2754,462098888,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MjA5ODg4OA==,6628425,2019-02-10T02:53:23Z,2019-02-10T02:53:23Z,MEMBER,"> What is still missing once 0.12 is released (plotting and resampling)? I don't have the full overview there. @mathause indeed we've made a lot of progress. A few remaining missing things that come to mind (there could be others) are: - Support for missing values in arrays of cftime objects (I should probably create an issue for this) - Possible PeriodIndex-like functionality with cftime objects (#2481) - [`coarsen`](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/8a1a8a1f13462440543581cd12fb96f22f0748bc/xarray/core/common.py#L593-L647) (coming in the next version of xarray) still needs to be updated to work with cftime coordinates (waiting on #2668 before starting on that) Out of those three, `coarsen` is probably the highest priority on my list at the moment (the other two would require some more careful thought). ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,407864596 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2754#issuecomment-462098476,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2754,462098476,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MjA5ODQ3Ng==,6628425,2019-02-10T02:42:12Z,2019-02-10T02:42:12Z,MEMBER,Thanks for your thoughts @shoyer; I like your suggested approach.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,407864596 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2754#issuecomment-461814892,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2754,461814892,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MTgxNDg5Mg==,6628425,2019-02-08T14:11:53Z,2019-02-08T14:11:53Z,MEMBER,"Thanks @mathause -- I'm assuming you are referring to this warning, rather than an error? ``` //anaconda/envs/xarray-dev-37/bin/ipython:2: SerializationWarning: Unable to decode time axis into full numpy.datetime64 objects, continuing using dummy cftime.datetime objects instead, reason: dates out of range ``` The rationale for keeping this warning is that for standard calendars (like `'proleptic_gregorian'`) we use pandas/NumPy dates by default; therefore falling back to using cftime in this circumstance is a deviation from the default behavior, which might come as a surprise to some users. I wonder if it might make sense to offer an [option](http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/generated/xarray.set_options.html) in xarray to always decode times to cftime dates, even for standard calendar dates between years 1678 and 2262 (which, if set, could also silence this warning); this would be another possible solution for #1263.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,407864596