html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2508#issuecomment-433117327,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2508,433117327,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzExNzMyNw==,11671536,2018-10-25T16:25:39Z,2018-10-25T16:25:39Z,NONE,"@shoyer , Good to know. Is there a reason not to automatically wrap the ufunc with a function to return the correct type so that `grouby.apply` still works as expected with generic ufuncs? I haven't thought through this extensively but it seems like the behavior would be well-defined, and, at least in my case, what the user would expect to happen. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373653203