html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-436751105,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,436751105,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNjc1MTEwNQ==,1217238,2018-11-07T19:38:39Z,2018-11-07T19:38:39Z,MEMBER,"Generally I always favor the most granular dependency specifications, but this seems like something conda-forge could decide as a matter of policy. If they don't want to rule on a general policy, then yes let's drop optional conda deps to match pypi.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-436707493,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,436707493,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNjcwNzQ5Mw==,2443309,2018-11-07T17:27:57Z,2018-11-07T17:27:57Z,MEMBER,Related and something I could use feedback from @pydata/xarray on: should we drop optional deps from the conda-forge build: https://github.com/conda-forge/xarray-feedstock/pull/37,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-436686085,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,436686085,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNjY4NjA4NQ==,2443309,2018-11-07T16:29:53Z,2018-11-07T16:29:53Z,MEMBER,Thanks @shoyer! ,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-436684494,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,436684494,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNjY4NDQ5NA==,1217238,2018-11-07T16:25:52Z,2018-11-07T16:25:52Z,MEMBER,I just tagged the release and uploaded it to pypi. RTD and conda forge should follow soon automatically.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-436497197,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,436497197,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNjQ5NzE5Nw==,1217238,2018-11-07T04:01:16Z,2018-11-07T04:01:16Z,MEMBER,"see https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2548 for some minor
reorganization of the release notes
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 7:57 PM Joe Hamman wrote:
> I'm observing that our checklist seems to be complete. Are we blocked on
> any outstanding issues?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> , or mute
> the thread
>
> .
>
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-436464907,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,436464907,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNjQ2NDkwNw==,2443309,2018-11-07T00:57:42Z,2018-11-07T00:57:42Z,MEMBER,I'm observing that our checklist seems to be complete. Are we blocked on any outstanding issues?,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-432741534,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,432741534,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc0MTUzNA==,2448579,2018-10-24T16:58:51Z,2018-11-04T19:03:27Z,MEMBER,"- [x] #2444 is a small bugfix for facetgrid that's ready for review.
These PRs seem to be almost done (it'd be nice to get some of these in):
#2470 (fill_value in shift)
#2449 (to_iris, from_iris)
#2207 (something about chunksizes)
#2415 (test for 1D object indexing)
#2413 (positional arguments for groupby apply)
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-435622842,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,435622842,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNTYyMjg0Mg==,1217238,2018-11-03T21:38:17Z,2018-11-03T21:38:17Z,MEMBER,"> Another deprecation cycle to finish would be the old resample() syntax.
I got started on this one...","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-434484745,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,434484745,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNDQ4NDc0NQ==,2448579,2018-10-30T21:56:42Z,2018-10-30T21:57:24Z,MEMBER,(commented on wrong issue),"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-434477760,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,434477760,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzNDQ3Nzc2MA==,1217238,2018-10-30T21:31:58Z,2018-10-30T21:31:58Z,MEMBER,Another deprecation cycle to finish would be the old `resample()` syntax.,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-433257199,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,433257199,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzI1NzE5OQ==,6628425,2018-10-26T01:31:34Z,2018-10-26T01:31:34Z,MEMBER,"@shoyer sure thing, barring feedback from others, I'll try and put a PR together tomorrow.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-433255897,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,433255897,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzI1NTg5Nw==,1217238,2018-10-26T01:22:26Z,2018-10-26T01:22:26Z,MEMBER,"@spencerkclark I also think this is probably a good idea. If you have time, it would be great if you could put together a PR to switch the behavior.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-433254999,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,433254999,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzI1NDk5OQ==,6628425,2018-10-26T01:16:28Z,2018-10-26T01:16:28Z,MEMBER,"> should we switch the default behavior to use cftime for non-standard calendars in 0.11?
I would be +1 on this; as evidenced by #2437 it has become increasingly confusing/error-prone to use non-standard/out-of-range dates without CFTimeIndex enabled. That said, since not everything is enabled yet (namely resample and plotting), I'd be sympathetic to those who would rather wait a bit longer.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-433235743,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,433235743,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzIzNTc0Mw==,1217238,2018-10-25T23:13:11Z,2018-10-25T23:13:11Z,MEMBER,@spencerkclark and other climate scientists: should we switch the default behavior to use `cftime` for non-standard calendars in 0.11? (see https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2437),"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-433133764,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,433133764,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzEzMzc2NA==,10050469,2018-10-25T17:15:54Z,2018-10-25T17:15:54Z,MEMBER,"Did any other library have a warning for this? I think that if we follow the lead of ipython, matplotlib and https://python3statement.org/ then all we have to do is make 0.12 non-installable on py2, and py2 users will stick to 0.11 *ad vitam æternam*.
It would be quite mean to have them listen to a warning all the time they import xarray on top of that :smile:
ipython [docs](https://ipython.readthedocs.io/en/stable/) have a big warning banner though ","{""total_count"": 3, ""+1"": 3, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-433098754,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,433098754,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzA5ODc1NA==,2443309,2018-10-25T15:33:53Z,2018-10-25T15:33:53Z,MEMBER,"> Python 2 users know the end is near.
Based on recent experience, I'm not quite as confident here 😄 ","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 1, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-433096681,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,433096681,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzA5NjY4MQ==,1217238,2018-10-25T15:28:38Z,2018-10-25T15:28:38Z,MEMBER,"> Would it make sense to add a deprecation warning for Python2 users in this release (xref #1876). Chances are, 0.12 will come after Jan-2019 when we're slated to drop Python2 support.
I agree, this will probably be the last major xarray release with Python 2 support. But I don't think there's much to be gained by adding a warning -- Python 2 users know the end is near.","{""total_count"": 2, ""+1"": 2, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-433093555,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,433093555,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMzA5MzU1NQ==,2443309,2018-10-25T15:20:41Z,2018-10-25T15:20:41Z,MEMBER,"Would it make sense to add a deprecation warning for Python2 users in this release (xref #1876). Chances are, 0.12 will come after Jan-2019 when we're slated to drop Python2 support.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-432878130,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,432878130,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjg3ODEzMA==,2448579,2018-10-25T01:05:22Z,2018-10-25T01:05:22Z,MEMBER,Oooh we're supposed to remove `.T` as an alias for `.transpose()` #1232. finally!,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 1, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-432745366,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,432745366,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc0NTM2Ng==,5635139,2018-10-24T17:08:26Z,2018-10-24T17:08:26Z,MEMBER,I'll do ` Iterating over a Dataset iterates only over its data_vars`,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2505#issuecomment-432743053,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2505,432743053,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQzMjc0MzA1Mw==,1197350,2018-10-24T17:02:10Z,2018-10-24T17:02:24Z,MEMBER,Would be nice to get #2487 finished before release. (zarr chunking bug),"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,373574495