html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2255#issuecomment-514707122,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2255,514707122,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNDcwNzEyMg==,10050469,2019-07-24T16:36:06Z,2019-07-24T16:36:06Z,MEMBER,">> I'm curious, are there features in rioxarray that could be pushed upstream?

> Depends on what the xarray maintainers would like to add. I would definitely like to see the open_rasterio function in rioxarray absorbed back into xarray. Things have just been really slow moving with the other PRs/issues.

Put another way: why don't we put all the logic in rioxarray and make rioxarray an optional dependency of xarray to open rio files?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,336371511