html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1757#issuecomment-349175571,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1757,349175571,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE3NTU3MQ==,17162724,2017-12-05T02:31:56Z,2017-12-07T03:23:51Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"@jhamman it was just a quick comparison with the docs online

see http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/generated/xarray.open_dataset.html 
vs 
http://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/generated/xarray.open_dataarray.html

The stickler in me wants to ensure the docs are the same for both functions (i.e. list the inputs are the same)  between `open_dataset` and `open_dataarray`. I thought it was just a 2 second copy and paste fix but my [PR](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1758), but it's failing so i'll take another look.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,278743801
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1757#issuecomment-349177419,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1757,349177419,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE3NzQxOQ==,6815844,2017-12-05T02:44:02Z,2017-12-05T02:44:02Z,MEMBER,"I think this is a documentation issue.

From the user side, it would be easier to understand if the arguments of this function are explicitly listed;
auto-completion or function help in Ipython would also work.

But from the developer side, the explicit arguments will increase the risk of bugs.

Personally, I prefer the explicit function arguments, but I will not oppose the decision by the group.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,278743801
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1757#issuecomment-349106003,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1757,349106003,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTEwNjAwMw==,2443309,2017-12-04T21:08:29Z,2017-12-04T21:08:29Z,MEMBER,@raybellwaves - can you explain what specific problem the current `open_dataarray` signature is causing? The `*args` and `**kwargs` appear to be correctly passed onto the `open_dataset` call.,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,278743801
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1757#issuecomment-348744269,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1757,348744269,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0ODc0NDI2OQ==,6815844,2017-12-03T06:42:24Z,2017-12-03T06:42:24Z,MEMBER,"Hi, raybellwaves,

I think `open_dataarray` also should provide the full input parameters.
This is written [here](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/master/xarray/backends/api.py#L316).
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,278743801