html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1686#issuecomment-343766018,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1686,343766018,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0Mzc2NjAxOA==,4414299,2017-11-12T20:42:13Z,2017-11-12T20:42:13Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Just looking at the rasterio [quickstart](https://mapbox.github.io/rasterio/quickstart.html), it seems that it'd be easy to generate the coordinates using the Affine instance (though that is only available in Rasterio > 1.0a, with 0.36.0 you just have the tuple containing the multipliers). I think that might solve the problem though, since I would expect the sign of `res`and the transform to be synchronized to  the same convention on the rasterio side, which might be breaking with the current code.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,271000579
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1686#issuecomment-341754146,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1686,341754146,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MTc1NDE0Ng==,4414299,2017-11-03T16:23:02Z,2017-11-03T16:23:02Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"@fmaussion Thanks!
I get the feeling there's probably something odd with rasterio here. I played around a bit and found that rasterio doesn't seem to care about the signs in the transform if the given upper left is (0,0) . Giving any of `from_origin(0, 0, i, j)` for `i, j = +-1` as the transform gives a warning about using the default geotransform and doesn't save it to the file.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,271000579
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1686#issuecomment-341746553,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1686,341746553,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MTc0NjU1Mw==,4414299,2017-11-03T15:59:25Z,2017-11-03T15:59:25Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"@fmaussion I've tested with both rasterio 0.36.0 and the current master branch (1.0a11), both seem to have the same behaviour.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,271000579