html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1447#issuecomment-308823486,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1447,308823486,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMwODgyMzQ4Ng==,2443309,2017-06-15T18:08:54Z,2017-06-15T18:08:54Z,MEMBER,"@benbovy - 

I don't have really strong opinions here but I can tell you what I've done with [xmap](https://github.com/jhamman/xmap). I basically tried to keep it simple and use the same name for all three (package full name, package import name, and the accessor name). My thoughts on how to handle longer names are generally the same, the package-full name could be anything (I'd be okay switching to `xarray-mapping`) and I like the idea of having an identifiable collection of extensions (+1 for `xarray` prefix). My gut reaction to `xrsignal` is to drop the `r` (`xsignal`) and perhaps to use `xsignal` as the accessor name as well. Just some thoughts and like I said, no strong opinions here.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,234658224