html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-475055360,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371,475055360,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3NTA1NTM2MA==,1217238,2019-03-20T22:34:22Z,2019-03-20T22:34:22Z,MEMBER,"NumPy does have a pretty bad review back-log :(

On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 11:01 AM chunweiyuan <notifications@github.com>
wrote:

> My personal hope is to keep this thread open just for the record. But
> given the non-activity on the numpy end, I honestly can't promise any
> resolution to this issue in the near future. Thanks!
>
> PS I persist because some people do seem to appreciate that PR and have
> forked it for their own use :)
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you commented.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-473387146>, or mute
> the thread
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABKS1gzAFmpKOTSi0ljefC46A79vp8m1ks5vW9_8gaJpZM4M73c4>
> .
>
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,221366244
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1371#issuecomment-293726771,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1371,293726771,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MzcyNjc3MQ==,1217238,2017-04-12T22:35:48Z,2017-04-12T22:35:48Z,MEMBER,"I'm sure this is useful, but we try to avoid putting new numeric methods in xarray itself. Would the underlying weighted quantile method (on NumPy arrays) be appropriate for numpy or scipy? Then we might consider adding a wrapper function in xarray (though again, we have to be cautious to avoid overloading xarray with too many methods).","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,221366244