html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1201#issuecomment-272308784,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1201,272308784,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjMwODc4NA==,1217238,2017-01-12T22:48:57Z,2017-01-12T22:48:57Z,MEMBER,"> I don't really understand what you mean here. Neither facetted nor non-facetted plots have any logic to greate geoaxes automatically.

Oops, I was indeed mixed up.

If we add a `projection` argument for faceted plots, we should certainly add it for non-faceted plots, too.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,200364693
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1201#issuecomment-272233221,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1201,272233221,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjIzMzIyMQ==,1217238,2017-01-12T17:52:19Z,2017-01-12T17:52:19Z,MEMBER,"This seems totally reasonable to me, and would be nice because it would improve the consistency between facetted and non-facetted plotting.

Going even further, we might even default to `projection=ccrs.PlateCarree()` if a cartopy transform is provided (see https://github.com/SciTools/cartopy/issues/645).

@fmaussion @jhamman any opinions?","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,200364693