html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274966778,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167,274966778,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDk2Njc3OA==,1217238,2017-01-24T22:58:28Z,2017-01-24T22:58:28Z,MEMBER,"The built docs look pretty good to me, so I think we can go ahead with
matplotlib 2.0: http://xarray.pydata.org/en/fix-docs/plotting.html
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 2:29 PM, Fabien Maussion
wrote:
> @shoyer I've tested mpl on the fix-docs
> branch and they seem to build properly (see the dashboard
> ), but for some reason
> xarray's webpage is unreachable right now so I can't see how it looks like.
> It's getting late here in central europe so if you want to make the release
> later today go ahead, MPL2 can wait.
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> , or mute
> the thread
>
> .
>
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,195971828
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274946195,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167,274946195,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDk0NjE5NQ==,1217238,2017-01-24T21:35:18Z,2017-01-24T21:35:18Z,MEMBER,"@rabernat the DataStore refactor will happen sometime soon I hope, but I will definitely coordinate with you!","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,195971828
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274945151,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167,274945151,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDk0NTE1MQ==,1217238,2017-01-24T21:31:17Z,2017-01-24T21:31:17Z,MEMBER,"Certainly, give it a try!
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Fabien Maussion
wrote:
> It is picky but it might be worth to pin mpl to v2 for nicer plots in the
> docs ;-) Am I allowed to try it out?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> , or mute
> the thread
>
> .
>
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,195971828
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-274942102,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167,274942102,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3NDk0MjEwMg==,1217238,2017-01-24T21:19:56Z,2017-01-24T21:19:56Z,MEMBER,"With the merge of #1222, I plan to issue the new release tonight or tomorrow morning (pending a successful doc build and a final check-over).","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,195971828
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-272667600,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167,272667600,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MjY2NzYwMA==,1217238,2017-01-15T01:52:50Z,2017-01-15T01:52:50Z,MEMBER,"@ghisvail Oops, I forgot to upload the source distribution to pypi (now fixed).
The final release should be some time this week, up to you if you want to wait.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,195971828
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-271793070,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167,271793070,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI3MTc5MzA3MA==,1217238,2017-01-11T06:55:23Z,2017-01-11T06:55:23Z,MEMBER,"There is never an ideal time to make a release cut, but this has been dragging on for too long. I just sent out an email announcing a release candidate for v0.9.0:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/xarray/Yc6A45zXmwM
Unlimited dimensions will have to wait to the v0.9.1 release, but that release can follow pretty shortly given that the changes should be mostly backwards compatible.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,195971828
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-269354153,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167,269354153,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2OTM1NDE1Mw==,1217238,2016-12-27T17:12:01Z,2016-12-27T17:12:01Z,MEMBER,"What's our status here? I'd like to get the release (maybe a release candidate) out this week if possible.
It would be great if someone else could take a look at #1166 and #1179.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,195971828
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1167#issuecomment-268703015,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1167,268703015,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2ODcwMzAxNQ==,1217238,2016-12-22T02:34:10Z,2016-12-22T02:34:10Z,MEMBER,"I also really want to merge #964 (the ""apply"" function) but the current API is a little too confusing. We could merge it without exposing it as public API for now and/or start building simplified versions (e.g., with an optional `dim` argument instead of `signature`).
I agree that it should be a top priority but I don't want to let it hold up 0.9 any longer, so I think we should release without it. `apply` does not change any APIs in a breaking way so we can even both put it in a minor release if desried (though obviously it is a big feature).","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,195971828