html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1079#issuecomment-258461994,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1079,258461994,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODQ2MTk5NA==,950575,2016-11-04T15:26:25Z,2016-11-04T15:26:25Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> We definitely ignore cell boundaries -- they don't (yet) have any place in the xarray data model.

Even though I would love to have that functionality I do not believe it is high priority. `cell boundaries` is a corner case, at least in my field of work, and 99% of the time it is OK to infer the intervals. Also, the name of the key word is quite clear: `infer_intervals`.

Maybe you could only add a note in the docs mentioning that the cell boundaries might exist?
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,187208913
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1079#issuecomment-258382469,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1079,258382469,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODM4MjQ2OQ==,950575,2016-11-04T09:33:42Z,2016-11-04T09:33:42Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"> Yes, it is a special case for pcolormesh though

A special case that I love. In the old Matlab day we had horrible hacks to get pcolor to work properly :smile: 

>  I'm not sure if the additional complexity added by cell boundaries is on the xarray devs priority list...

That is fine. Maybe a warning in the docs would be nice. So people can revert to a ""manual"" plotting to get the boundaries right.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,187208913
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1079#issuecomment-258378187,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1079,258378187,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI1ODM3ODE4Nw==,950575,2016-11-04T09:12:47Z,2016-11-04T09:12:47Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Is `infer_intervals` creating coordinate bounds for plotting? It looks like it. What about when we do have cell boundaries in the dataset? (See http://cfconventions.org/cf-conventions/v1.6.0/cf-conventions.html#cell-boundaries). Will those be ignored and the inferred one used?

(Sorry if I am only making noise here and this does not make sense. In that case just ignore my comment.)
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,187208913