html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/840#issuecomment-457953415,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/840,457953415,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ1Nzk1MzQxNQ==,26384082,2019-01-27T20:55:37Z,2019-01-27T20:55:37Z,NONE,"In order to maintain a list of currently relevant issues, we mark issues as stale after a period of inactivity
If this issue remains relevant, please comment here; otherwise it will be marked as closed automatically
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,152478345
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/840#issuecomment-216122656,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/840,216122656,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDIxNjEyMjY1Ng==,1217238,2016-05-02T07:26:54Z,2016-05-02T07:26:54Z,MEMBER,"In the second multiplication, you are multiplying an array with dimensions (b,) by one with dimensions (a,b). This results in something with dimensions (b,a), because we broadcast dimensions in order of appearance.

I agree that it would be nice to swap dimensions back in assignment, at least in this context. But I'll just note that we currently don't do _any_ alignment of RHS arguments in assignment operations, so we would need to think about the full implications of doing such alignment.
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,152478345