html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7105#issuecomment-1271519573,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7105,1271519573,IC_kwDOAMm_X85LydlV,4160723,2022-10-07T12:20:49Z,2022-10-07T12:20:49Z,MEMBER,"Tests should be ok now, although this is not a super clean workaround. IndexVariable still needs some more refactoring anyway.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1390999159
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7105#issuecomment-1266068474,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7105,1266068474,IC_kwDOAMm_X85Ldqv6,4160723,2022-10-03T21:22:42Z,2022-10-03T21:22:42Z,MEMBER,"Yes I agree it would be nice if we can roll back this breaking change. However, it really conflicts with `.xindexes` that returns the same index instance for each of its corresponding coordinate. This roll back seems to mostly break things where we need to be smart while handling multi-index coordinates passed to DataArray / Dataset constructors. This might be tricky to solve. It would probably be easier to do it after #6392.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1390999159