html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6891#issuecomment-1484199176,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6891,1484199176,IC_kwDOAMm_X85YdxUI,43316012,2023-03-26T19:30:08Z,2023-03-26T19:30:25Z,COLLABORATOR,"As said above, you don't have to change code to make it work. The intended way of using is `da.curvefit(...., kwargs={""method"": ""trf""})`.

You can submit a PR which changes **kwargs to kwargs in the docstring (both, Dataset.curvefit and DataArray.curvefit) and probably add some more info there.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1331985070
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6891#issuecomment-1484195905,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6891,1484195905,IC_kwDOAMm_X85YdwhB,43316012,2023-03-26T19:16:38Z,2023-03-26T19:16:38Z,COLLABORATOR,"Actually, as @kmuehlbauer pointed out, we can address this for now by updating the docstring of the function.
It should get clear the the extra kwargs are passed as a dict and not as **kwargs.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1331985070
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6891#issuecomment-1484188179,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6891,1484188179,IC_kwDOAMm_X85YduoT,43316012,2023-03-26T19:02:12Z,2023-03-26T19:02:12Z,COLLABORATOR,"I think we should continue the discussion in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7130
since it is not clear which function signature (kwargs vs **kwargs) is preferred.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1331985070