html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6845#issuecomment-1198923887,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6845,1198923887,IC_kwDOAMm_X85HdiBv,35968931,2022-07-29T06:23:59Z,2022-07-29T06:23:59Z,MEMBER,"My understanding is that if `__array_function__` is working correctly you should never need to call `cupy.round` on your dataarray. Instead you should always be able to call `np.round` and trust that the `__array_function__` implementation will dispatch to cupy's equivalent of `round` automatically. 

Is there actually a case where we need the library-specific version of a numpy function to work too?



> Do we need to update AbstractArray.__array__ to return the underlying duck array instead of always a numpy array?

(Having said all that we might still want to make this change anyway, this was just an argument for the current behaviour being ""good enough"".)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1321228754