html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6555#issuecomment-1114343924,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6555,1114343924,IC_kwDOAMm_X85Ca4n0,5635139,2022-05-01T21:48:34Z,2022-05-01T21:48:34Z,MEMBER,"> I guess my understanding of indexes was: ""no index"" == ""default index ~range(0,n)"".

Yeah — that is the case in pandas. But in xarray, we can have dims without indexes, so adding one is making a change...","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1222215528
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6555#issuecomment-1114302353,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6555,1114302353,IC_kwDOAMm_X85CaueR,5635139,2022-05-01T18:16:30Z,2022-05-01T18:16:30Z,MEMBER,"Would we then have a different schema for different values of `ascending`?

If that's correct I would vote against this; I empathize with the confusion, but then the caller can add an index, and generally we don't want different values of arguments to create different schema without a very obvious and explicit connection between them.

Tbh even if the proposal is to add the index for any value of `ascending`, I'd be marginally against; it's not what I'd expect as a user. But open-minded on this.

(Thanks for adding the issue @headtr1ck , hope this comes across as constructive)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1222215528