html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/655#issuecomment-156864017,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/655,156864017,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1Njg2NDAxNw==,1217238,2015-11-15T22:20:04Z,2015-11-15T22:20:04Z,MEMBER,"Thanks @fmaussion! ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,116349205 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/655#issuecomment-156861015,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/655,156861015,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1Njg2MTAxNQ==,1217238,2015-11-15T22:07:02Z,2015-11-15T22:07:02Z,MEMBER,"OK, this looks good to me. I'm just waiting on @mwaskom before merging. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,116349205 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/655#issuecomment-156758224,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/655,156758224,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1Njc1ODIyNA==,1217238,2015-11-14T23:36:18Z,2015-11-14T23:36:18Z,MEMBER,"@fmaussion try pulling the latest master and rebasing this branch? If that doesn't work for you, I can apply this change manually. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,116349205 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/655#issuecomment-156611108,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/655,156611108,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1NjYxMTEwOA==,1217238,2015-11-14T02:25:02Z,2015-11-14T02:25:02Z,MEMBER,"This looks good to be -- the tests seem to nail this down pretty well, even though the logic has indeed become more convoluted. @mwaskom any concerns from your side? Please do do a rebase/squash (most importantly to eliminate any commits that failed CI) and also please add a shirt change note to a ""breaking changes"" section of the what's new docs. This will probably not make it in until the 0.7 release (which probably _will_ be our next release), but just go ahead and put it in the 0.6.2 notes for now and we'll reorganize later. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,116349205 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/655#issuecomment-155918906,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/655,155918906,MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDE1NTkxODkwNg==,1217238,2015-11-11T21:43:03Z,2015-11-11T21:43:03Z,MEMBER,"> 1. The only safe times to assume a diverging colormap is when vmin = -vmax or when center is not None. If you want a diverging colormap for other situations, you need to specify cmap in the plot call. I actually agree with @mwaskom here. I would not make inferring a diverging colormap dependent on `vmin = -vmax` (assuming `center=0`). It's useful to be able to control the bounds of a diverging colormap by only setting one of `vmin` and `vmax`, and comparing `vmin - center == center - vmax` seems prone to numerical precision issues. I do agree with principles 1 and 2, though. ","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,116349205