html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6329#issuecomment-1064981526,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6329,1064981526,IC_kwDOAMm_X84_elQW,6574622,2022-03-11T10:28:35Z,2022-03-11T10:28:35Z,CONTRIBUTOR,Thanks for pointing out `region` again. I've updated the header and the initial comment.,"{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1159923690
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6329#issuecomment-1063977656,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6329,1063977656,IC_kwDOAMm_X84_awK4,6574622,2022-03-10T11:56:44Z,2022-03-10T11:56:44Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Yes, this is kind of the behaviour I'd expect. And great that it helped clarifying things.
Still, building up the metadata nicely upfront (which is required for region writes) ist quite convoluted... That's what I meant with
> some better tooling for writing and updating zarr dataset metadata (I don't know if that would fit in the realm of xarray though, as it looks like handling Datasets without content. For ""appending"" metadata, I really don't know how I'd picture this propery in xarray world.)

in the [previous comment](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6069#issuecomment-1052240616). I think, establishing and documenting good practices for this would help, but probably we also want to have better tools. In any case, this would probably be yet another issue.

Note that if you care about this **paricular** example (e.g. appending in a single thread in increasing order of timesteps), then it should also be possible to do this much simpler using append:

```python
filename='processed_dataset.zarr'
ds = xr.tutorial.open_dataset('air_temperature')
ds.air.encoding['dtype']=np.dtype('float32')
X,Y=250, 250 #size of each final timestep

for i in range(len(ds.time)):
    # some kind of heavy processing
    arr_r=some_processing(ds.isel(time=slice(i,i+1)),X,Y)
    del arr_r.air.attrs[""_FillValue""]
    if os.path.exists(filename):
        arr_r.to_zarr(filename, append_dim='time')
    else:
        arr_r.to_zarr(filename)
```

If you find out more about the cloud case, please post a note, otherwise, we can assume that the original bug report is fine?","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1159923690
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6329#issuecomment-1063859715,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6329,1063859715,IC_kwDOAMm_X84_aTYD,6574622,2022-03-10T09:44:59Z,2022-03-10T09:44:59Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Sure, no problem.
I believe, [this page](https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/generated/xarray.Dataset.to_zarr.html#xarray-dataset-to-zarr) has a good summary:

> mode (`{""w"", ""w-"", ""a"", ""r+"", None}`, *optional*) – Persistence mode: “w” means create (overwrite if exists); “w-” means create (fail if exists); “a” means override existing variables (create if does not exist); “r+” means modify existing array values only (raise an error if any metadata or shapes would change). The default mode is “a” if `append_dim` is set. Otherwise, it is “r+” if `region` is set and `w-` otherwise.

So the difference between ""a"" and ""r+"" roughly codifies the intended behaviour for sequential access (it's ok to modify everything) and parallel access to independent chunks (where modifying metadata would be bad).

So probably that message was suggesting that you have to use ""a"" if you want to modify metadata (e.g. by expanding the shape), which is true. But to me, it's unclear how one would do that safely with (potentially) parallel region writes, so it's kind of reasonable that region writes don't like to modify metadata.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1159923690
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6329#issuecomment-1062755678,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6329,1062755678,IC_kwDOAMm_X84_WF1e,6574622,2022-03-09T10:06:22Z,2022-03-09T10:06:22Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Yes, that looks like the error as described in the initial post.
Adding the described workaround (i.e. `del buff.air.attrs[""_FillValue""]` in this case) leads to the next error message:

```
ValueError: variable 'air' already exists with different dimension sizes: {'time': 0, 'y': 250, 'x': 250} != {'time': 1, 'y': 250, 'x': 250}. to_zarr() only supports changing dimension sizes when explicitly appending, but append_dim=None.
```

Which is due to a mix of append-mode (`mode='a'`) and region-write (`region={'time':slice(i,i+1)}`), which is e.g. out of the scope as outlined in [this comment](https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6069#issuecomment-1052240616). It may or may not be possible or intended to support this, but I'm not deep enough into the design of xarray to give a definitive answer here. For me, it's unclear how this should behave. My current point of view is:

* append: may change structure-defining metadata, must be sequential, `mode='a'`
* region: may not change structure-defining metadata, can be parallel, `mode='r+'`

Currently, I can't really imagine how a mix of both should behave. If you can't prepare the dataset for the final shape upfront (to use `region`) and you also can't use `append_dim`, then probably what's needed is a separate method of expanding the dataset (i.e. reshape) without filling in the data. If such a thing would be available, one could (as a user) ensure that all reshaping operations are properly sequenced with region operations, but region operations could be run in parallel. (I think this is possible with plain-zarr, but I'm not aware of a corresponding xarray API).","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1159923690
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6329#issuecomment-1061711069,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6329,1061711069,IC_kwDOAMm_X84_SGzd,6574622,2022-03-08T12:09:38Z,2022-03-08T12:09:38Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"You've got the `encoding` of `air` set to `int16`:
```python
print(buff.air.encoding)
```
```
{'source': '.../xarray_tutorial_data/69c68be1605878a6c8efdd34d85b4ca1-air_temperature.nc', 'original_shape': (2920, 25, 53), 'dtype': dtype('int16'), 'scale_factor': 0.01, 'grid_mapping': 'spatial_ref'}
```","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1159923690
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6329#issuecomment-1061081884,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6329,1061081884,IC_kwDOAMm_X84_PtMc,6574622,2022-03-07T20:03:18Z,2022-03-07T20:03:18Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"Sorry, @Boorhin. But the code example you showed has many syntax errors:

```
$ python3 test.py
  File ""test.py"", line 8
    return arr_r.x.values, arr_r.y.values
    ^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
```
(there are more and I wasn't sure how to fix them at all places to match what you likely wanted to express)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1159923690
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6329#issuecomment-1059426353,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6329,1059426353,IC_kwDOAMm_X84_JZAx,6574622,2022-03-04T18:48:13Z,2022-03-04T18:48:13Z,CONTRIBUTOR,"If that's necessary to reproduce the problem, then yes. If it's possible to show the same thing with less ""noise"", then it's better to not use the tutorial dataset and to not use something like a cloud backend. But we can also try to iterate on this again, to progressively get down to a smaller example.","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1159923690