html_url,issue_url,id,node_id,user,created_at,updated_at,author_association,body,reactions,performed_via_github_app,issue
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6211#issuecomment-1026020646,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6211,1026020646,IC_kwDOAMm_X849J9Um,6213168,2022-01-31T17:21:40Z,2022-01-31T17:21:40Z,MEMBER,"> More than a one-off — I got them multiple times. Though they look like tests that are liable to be flaky...
They are both tests that fail on the cleanup of ``@gen_cluster``, and specifically on ``check_process_leak``.
However, in both cases, the test itself doesn't spawn any processes. What I think is happening is that something unrelated, at some point *before* the failing tests, spawned a subprocess that has become unresponsive to SIGTERM.
I'm updating ``check_process_leak`` to be more aggressive in the cleanup before the test.","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1118729170
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6211#issuecomment-1025305914,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6211,1025305914,IC_kwDOAMm_X849HO06,5635139,2022-01-31T01:48:56Z,2022-01-31T01:48:56Z,MEMBER,"RTD is being slow, but I'll merge regardless so we can return to green","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1118729170
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6211#issuecomment-1025264731,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6211,1025264731,IC_kwDOAMm_X849HExb,5635139,2022-01-30T23:59:25Z,2022-01-30T23:59:25Z,MEMBER,"> I haven't seen them fail before - were they just flaky?
More than a one-off — I got them multiple times. Though they look like tests that are liable to be flaky...","{""total_count"": 1, ""+1"": 1, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1118729170
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6211#issuecomment-1025249089,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6211,1025249089,IC_kwDOAMm_X849HA9B,10194086,2022-01-30T22:38:50Z,2022-01-30T22:38:50Z,MEMBER,I haven't seen them fail before - were they just flaky?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1118729170
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6211#issuecomment-1025244455,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6211,1025244455,IC_kwDOAMm_X849G_0n,5635139,2022-01-30T22:15:23Z,2022-01-30T22:15:23Z,MEMBER,We have another couple of failures though. I'll xfail them but please could someone who knows the dask interface better check them out and assess if we should raise them on the dask repo?,"{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1118729170
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6211#issuecomment-1025244352,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6211,1025244352,IC_kwDOAMm_X849G_zA,5635139,2022-01-30T22:14:46Z,2022-01-30T22:14:46Z,MEMBER,"> Can I suggest you xfail in
No prob, you do lots!
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1118729170
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6211#issuecomment-1025242330,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6211,1025242330,IC_kwDOAMm_X849G_Ta,10194086,2022-01-30T22:04:29Z,2022-01-30T22:04:29Z,MEMBER,"Can I suggest you xfail in
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/5470d933452d88deb17cc9294a164c4a03f55dec/xarray/tests/test_variable.py#L2105
(sorry, could have done this myself...)
","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1118729170
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6211#issuecomment-1025240390,https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6211,1025240390,IC_kwDOAMm_X849G-1G,14808389,2022-01-30T21:54:03Z,2022-01-30T21:54:10Z,MEMBER,"makes sense, feel free to merge as soon as the CI is green. That way, we can avoid having the CI fail in other PRs (this is not just a upstream-dev issue anymore)","{""total_count"": 0, ""+1"": 0, ""-1"": 0, ""laugh"": 0, ""hooray"": 0, ""confused"": 0, ""heart"": 0, ""rocket"": 0, ""eyes"": 0}",,1118729170